Natl Assn of Optomet, et al v. Lockyer, et al

Filing 472

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/01/09. Plaintiff is to file a notice of whether it wishes to continue litigation not later than twenty (20) days from the date of this order.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The court is in receipt of the Mandate from the Ninth Circuit in the above-captioned case. Plaintiff is to file a notice of whether it wishes to continue litigation not later than twenty (20) days from the date of this order. //// 1 BILL LOCKYER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California; and CHARLENE ZETTEL, in her official capacity as Director of the Department of Consumer Affairs, Defendants. / NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF OPTOMETRISTS & OPTICIANS; LENSCRAFTERS, INC; and EYE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC., NO. CIV. S-02-1464 LKK/DAD ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 1, 2009. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?