Sprinkle v. Robinson, et al

Filing 122

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/06/09 ordering the parties are hereby ordered to brief the issues contained in the district judge's 09/29/09 order. Within 30 days from the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall file his opening brief on these questions. Within 2 weeks of th service and filing of plaintiff's brief, defendants shall file their response brief. Plaintiff's reply, if any, shall be filed within 2 weeks of service of defendant's response brief. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. LEON ROBINSON, et al., Defendants. / The parties are hereby ordered to brief the issues contained in the district judge's September 29, 2009 order; specifically, whether the inclusion of plaintiff's exhibits with his habeas petition would have altered the result of his criminal conviction and sentence, and how that issue relates to plaintiff's claim for damages. Within thirty days from the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall file his opening brief on these questions. Within two weeks of the service and filing of plaintiff's brief, defendants shall file their response brief. Plaintiff's reply, if any, shall be filed withing two weeks of the service of defendant's response brief. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 6, 2009. ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARK WAYNE SPRINKLE, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-02-1563 LKK EFB P

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?