McNeal v. Fleming, et al

Filing 281

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/8/2014. Plaintiff's 279 Objections were contrued by Court as Request for Reconsideration of Magistrate Judge Delaney's 277 Order denying Motion to Appoint Counsel. Court also finds that the ruling was not clearly erroneous and is therefore AFFIRMED. (Marciel, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

VERNON WAYNE MCNEAL,

12

No. 2:02-cv-2524 TLN CKD P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

FLEMING, et al.,

15

ORDER

Defendants.

16
17

On August 25, 2014, Plaintiff filed a document the Court construes as a request for

18

reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order filed June 24, 2014 denying Plaintiff’s motion for

19

the appointment of counsel. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall

20

be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the Court

21

finds that the magistrate judge’s ruling was not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Therefore,

22

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed

23

June 24, 2014 is affirmed.

24

Dated: September 8, 2014

25
26
27
28

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge