McNeal v. Fleming, et al

Filing 289

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/27/14 denying 280 Motion to Compel. Plaintiff's request for authentication 288 is denied. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VERNON WAYNE MCNEAL, 12 No. 2:02-cv-2524 TLN CKD P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 FLEMING, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for violation of civil 17 18 rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter is scheduled for re-trial on January 12, 2015 before 19 Judge Nunley. On September 2, 2014, plaintiff filed a motion asking that the court order defendants to 20 21 turn over to plaintiff a copy of the script which was used by correctional officers interviewing 22 prisoners following the use of force by a correctional officer in 2001. Because plaintiff fails to 23 show that this is relevant to any issue which will be presented at trial, plaintiff’s motion will be 24 denied. Also, plaintiff asks that the court “authenticate” exhibit A attached to defendants’ 25 26 opposition to plaintiff’s motion to compel. This is not a proper request as the court does not 27 “authenticate” exhibits. If plaintiff has concerns regarding the authenticity of an exhibit provided 28 ///// 1 by defendants as it pertains to the admissibility of the exhibit at trial, plaintiff should address his 2 concerns to counsel for defendants. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. Plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF No. 280) is denied; and 5 2. Plaintiff’s “request for authentication” (ECF No. 288) is denied. 6 Dated: October 27, 2014 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 1 mcne2524.mtc(2) 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?