McNeal v. Fleming, et al

Filing 330

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/8/2017 DENYING 324 Motion to Continue. (Hunt, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VERNON MCNEAL, 12 No. 2:02-cv-02524-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 FLEMING, et al., 15 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO CONTINUE Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Vernon McNeal’s (“Plaintiff”) motion to 18 continue the trial. (ECF No. 324.) The Court requested Defendants respond to the motion. (ECF 19 No. 325.) Defendants filed a response opposing the motion. (ECF No. 328.) 20 Plaintiff moves to continue on the grounds that he has been preparing for another trial and 21 has not been preparing to work on this trial. (ECF No. 324 at 2.) Plaintiff also contends he did 22 not have the boxes containing his legal documents and thus was unable to prepare. (ECF No. 324 23 at 2.) Defendants argue Plaintiff has not shown good cause for continuing the trial. (ECF No. 24 328.) Defendants assert the good cause standard requires a showing of diligence and Plaintiff 25 cannot show diligence here. (ECF No. 328 at 4.) 26 Defendants are correct that a Pretrial Scheduling Order “may be modified only for good 27 cause.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). The party seeking to amend must show good cause. Johnson v. 28 Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 608 (9th Cir. 1992). “Rule 16(b)’s ‘good cause’ 1 1 standard primarily considers the diligence of the party seeking amendment.” Id. at 609. “If that 2 party was not diligent, the inquiry should end.” Id. 3 This is not the first request Plaintiff has made to continue the trial. Plaintiff has repeatedly 4 requested to move the trial for the same reason as stated here — he is preparing for the other trial. 5 On February 1, 2017, the Court reset the trial to February 26, 2018, an entire year later, in order 6 to afford Plaintiff ample time to prepare. (ECF No. 315.) The Court also noted it would look 7 upon with disfavor any future requests for continuance that raised Plaintiff’s other trial as 8 justification. (ECF No. 315.) Now nine months later, Plaintiff requests the Court vacate its trial 9 set for February 26, 2018, and not set any future dates until his other case has gone to trial. 10 Through his own admission Plaintiff demonstrates he has not been diligent. Plaintiff admits he 11 has been preparing for his other trial and not preparing for this trial. Accordingly, the Court 12 cannot find good cause exists to continue the trial. For the reasons set forth above, Plaintiff’s 13 motion to continue (ECF No. 324.) is hereby DENIED. 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 8, 2017 16 17 18 19 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?