Hillhouse v. Wong

Filing 240

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 08/23/12 ordering ( Motion Hearing re-set for 10/9/2012 at 01:30 PM in Redding (CMK) before Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison.) Petitioner's reply deadline is extended accordingly. In addit ion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), Kevin Chappell, action warden of California State Prison at San Quentin is hereby substituted for his predecessor. The clerk of the court is directed to update the docket to reflect the above caption. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANNIE RAY HILLHOUSE, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. CIV S-03-0142-MCE-CMK DEATH PENALTY CASE vs. ORDER KEVIN CHAPPELL, 15 Respondent. 16 / 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with appointed counsel, seeks a writ of 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the court is Petitioner’s motion to 19 expand the record, (Doc. 2330), currently set for hearing on August 29, 2012. The court also has 20 pending before it budget issues which are currently unresolved. As a result of those budgeting 21 issues, the petitioner has been unable to file a reply to respondent’s response to the motion. 22 The court finds it appropriate to sua sponte reset the hearing on the motion to 23 expand to October 9, 2012, at 1:30 p.m. Petitioner’s reply deadline is extended accordingly. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 1 1 In addition, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), Kevin Chappell, 2 acting warden of California State Prison at San Quentin, is hereby substituted for his predecessor. 3 The Clerk of the Court is directed to update the docket to reflect the above caption. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 8 DATED: August 23, 2012 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?