Steele v. Woodford
Filing
193
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 11/30/11 ORDERING that the portion of the 11/10/10 order adopting the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendations on procedural default is VACATED. This case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further consideration and findings and recommendations. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
RAYMOND EDWARD STEELE,
Petitioner,
9
v.
10
12
JOHN STOKES, Acting Warden of
California State Prison at San
Quentin,
13
Respondent.
________________________________
11
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:03-cv-00143-GEB-CKD
ORDER*
14
15
Respondent filed a motion to reconsider “this Court’s November
16
10, 201[0] order (Doc. 164) adopting the findings and recommendations of
17
the Magistrate Judge regarding the adequacy of California’s procedural
18
defaults imposed against petitioner in this case.” (Mot. 1:8-10.) In his
19
opposition brief, Petitioner states: there “seems to be appropriate
20
grounds for referring the matter back to the Magistrate Judge for
21
supplemental briefing in light of the new Supreme Court case[, Walker v.
22
Martin, 562 U.S. ----, 131 S.Ct. 1120 (2011)]. If the Court construes
23
respondent’s motion as a request to refer the matter back to the
24
Magistrate Judge, petitioner does not oppose the request.” (Opp’n 2:12-
25
15.)
In light of Petitioner’s statement and the recent Supreme
26
27
28
*
argument.
This matter is deemed suitable for decision without oral
E.D. Cal. R. 230(g).
1
1
Court decision, the portion of the November 10, 2010 order adopting the
2
Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations on “procedural default”
3
is vacated. (ECF No. 164 2:3-4; ECF No. 151 5:16-34:20.) This case is
4
referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further consideration and
5
findings and recommendations on the “procedural default” issue, in light
6
of Walker.
7
Dated:
November 30, 2011
8
9
10
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?