Steele v. Woodford
Filing
241
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/19/2014 APPOINTING Michael Snedeker as co-counsel for petitioner. Mr. Snedeker shall review the budgeting procedures attached as Appendix A. In addition, Mr. Snedeker shall complete the attached Rate Justification Worksheet, Appendix B, and file it under seal within ten days. Within 5 days, petitioner's counsel shall inform the court whether they intend to seek another extension of the opening brief deadline. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RAYMOND EDWARD STEELE,
12
13
14
Petitioner,
No. 2:03-CV-0143 GEB CKD
DEATH PENALTY CASE
v.
WARDEN, San Quentin State Prison,
15
ORDER
Respondent.
16
17
The Court being sufficiently advised, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3599 and by
18
recommendation of the Selection Board for the Eastern District of California, Michael R.
19
Snedeker, Snedeker, Smith & Short, 4110 SE Hawthorne Blvd PMB 422, Portland, OR 97214,
20
m.snedeker@comcast.net, (503) 234-3584, Fax: (503) 232-3215, is appointed co-counsel for
21
petitioner.
22
Mr. Snedeker shall review the budgeting procedures attached as Appendix A. In addition,
23
Mr. Snedeker shall complete the attached Rate Justification Worksheet, Appendix B, and file it
24
under seal within ten days of the filed date of this order.
25
Petitioner’s opening brief regarding the application of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) is due in one
26
month. (ECF No. 239.) The court recognizes that, in his April request for an extension of time,
27
petitioner’s counsel anticipated having a second attorney selected and appointed by mid-May.
28
(ECF No. 238.) Within five days of the filed date of this order, petitioner’s counsel shall inform
1
1
the court whether they intend to seek another extension of this briefing deadline. Thereafter, the
2
court will require Mr. Snedeker to propose a budget for his time in this proceeding.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 19, 2014
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Steele atty appt.or
25
26
27
28
2
1
APPENDIX A
2
3
Counsel appointed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3599 and Local Rule 191 to represent a
4
condemned prisoner seeking relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 will be required to propose budgets
5
for their time and expenses anticipated during each phase of the proceedings. Set out below are
6
the procedures for proposing budgets and submitting vouchers for reimbursement.
7
8
9
BUDGET PROCEDURES
1.
Under 18 U.S.C. ' 3599(f), ex parte consideration of funding applications requires
10
petitioner to make a showing of the need for confidentiality. Since budget applications require
11
disclosure of matters protected by the attorney-client or work-product privileges, the need for
12
confidentiality is inherent in the budgeting process. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1) and (3).
13
Accordingly, budget forms and supporting documentation will be filed under seal and not served
14
on counsel for respondent. Counsel shall submit budget-related filings by e-mailing them to the
15
court=s AApproved Sealed@ e-mail address, ApprovedSealed@caed.uscourts.gov. The provisions
16
of Local Rule 141 regarding the process for filing documents under seal are suspended with
17
respect to budgeting in capital habeas cases. Any ex parte court proceeding regarding funding
18
will be reported and maintained under seal.
19
2.
A proposed budget should reflect the total attorney time required, including time
20
for budget preparation, as well as the time for paralegals, investigators and experts, if applicable,
21
and any anticipated travel or other expenses. Voucher preparation, however, is considered part of
22
overhead and not reimbursable. In preparing a budget, counsel shall refer to the Ninth Circuit
23
Judicial Council=s costs policies for capital habeas cases. Current cost policies are available on
24
this court=s website at www.caed.uscourts.gov, under Forms, CJA Capital Habeas Forms.
25
3.
In support of the proposed budget for each phase, counsel shall file informative
26
declaration(s) which explain and/or justify the hours, tasks, and expenses sought. Counsel shall
27
include any information that will assist the court in determining the reasonableness of the budget
28
request. If petitioner is represented by two attorneys, counsel shall explain how the work will be
3
1
divided between them. The supporting documentation should be captioned and filed under seal in
2
a complete application, including explanatory remarks, declarations, and exhibits. All supporting
3
declarations must be properly subscribed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1746.
4
4.
Counsel are expected to utilize all reasonable means to minimize costs, to tier staff
5
responsibilities to lower-rate personnel whenever practical, and to utilize paralegals and law
6
clerks to complete tasks for which attorney expertise is not required.
7
5.
Requests in the budget for investigative and/or expert assistance should be detailed
8
and present the factual basis to support the request. Prior to approval, the court must find that the
9
requested expert or investigative assistance is Areasonably necessary for the representation of the
10
defendant.@ 18 U.S.C. ' 3599(f). Information which should be included in the supporting
11
declaration to assist the court includes, but is not limited to, a specification of: (1) the evidence
12
sought to be uncovered; (2) facts suggesting that such investigation, expert service, or other
13
assistance is warranted; (3) whether the evidence existed at the time of the state trial; (4) whether
14
similar assistance was provided or requested in state court; (5) the purpose of the evidence on
15
federal habeas, that is, the connection of the evidence sought to be uncovered to a prospective
16
claim or contention that will be raised in the federal petition; (6) the name of the expert or
17
investigator; and (7) the proposed billing rate and the reasonableness of the rate. Presumptive
18
rates contained in the Ninth Circuit Capital Habeas Costs Policy will apply to all experts,
19
investigators, and paralegals.
20
6.
The approved budget for each phase will be one sum for attorney time and one
21
sum for expenses. In addition, each expert and investigator=s time will be a separate budget
22
figure. Counsel generally will not be allowed to exceed the authorized budget during any phase
23
without first seeking prior approval, or amendment to the budget, and explaining why additional
24
funds are required. Failing to obtain approval to amend the budget could result in the denial of
25
unauthorized or excessive expenditures.
26
7.
The budget for each phase will be closed out when the work for that phase is
27
completed. Hours and expenditures will not be carried over to the next phase. Rather, a new
28
budget for each succeeding phase must be proposed by counsel and approved by the court. As
4
1
the case progresses through each case management phase, counsel are responsible for ensuring
2
that the case is litigated within the established budget.
3
8.
Any budget approved by the district court must also be approved by the Judicial
4
Council of the Ninth Circuit. Counsel are authorized to proceed based upon the initial budget
5
approved by the district court and will be contacted should any further clarification, information,
6
or action be requested by the Judicial Council.
7
8
9
APPROVED COMPENSATION
1.
Work inherently necessary to practice and remain current in the area of federal
10
habeas law, which is not directly attributable to a particular case, including the review and
11
analysis of new cases, is considered general overhead, and is not reimbursable.
12
13
14
2.
The court will not approve compensation for administrative services, such as
secretarial services, preparation of payment vouchers, or communications with court staff.
3.
Unless a contrary need is demonstrated, the court will compensate only one
15
attorney for physical attendance at court hearings. Upon sufficient justification, the court may
16
authorize compensation for up to two members of counsel=s legal staff at a time for visits to
17
petitioner and witness interviews. Counsel who reside outside the Sacramento area will typically
18
make court appearances by telephone unless they have requested, and been approved, for travel to
19
Sacramento.
20
4.
The court will not approve compensation for work performed on appellate
21
proceedings (whether from interlocutory orders or final judgments). Counsel shall seek
22
compensation for work performed at the appellate level from the Court of Appeals after having
23
obtained an appointment from that court.
24
5.
The court will compensate counsel for professional time spent in airport (or other
25
common carrier) terminals and as a passenger on common carriers only when counsel is
26
performing substantive tasks on the case that can be billed to a professional time category.
27
Terminal processing time as well as driving time will be compensated at the maximum rate of
28
$100 per hour. In light of the public service nature of CJA appointments together with the fact
5
1
that public rather than private funds are being utilized, the travel reimbursement set forth in this
2
paragraph will be applied.
3
4
5
APPROVED EXPENSES
1.
The court will authorize payment for miscellaneous expenses reasonably incurred
6
and subject to national and district policies and procedures. Copies of all bills and receipts must
7
be submitted for reimbursement approval.
8
9
2.
Mileage for case-related travel by privately owned (not rented) automobile may be
claimed at the rate in effect for federal judicial employees, available from the CJA Administrator.
10
Case-related parking fees and bridge/road tolls also are reimbursable. Counsel should assess
11
whether case-related travel would be more cost effective by privately owned automobile or rented
12
automobile.
13
3.
Ground transportation other than by privately owned automobile will be
14
reimbursed on an actual expense basis. Counsel should make every effort to obtain the lowest
15
possible fares or rates.
16
4.
Though travel expenses may be authorized in the budget, each time a member of
17
petitioner=s litigation team intends to travel by air, a Travel Request and Authorization Form must
18
be authorized by the CJA Administrator and approved by the court, unless counsel can procure
19
more economical travel arrangements on his or her own. Approval of a travel authorization form
20
is the procedure by which government rates for travel are obtained; the form does not function as
21
approval of travel expenses in excess of the budget. Should the authorized budget be insufficient
22
for the anticipated costs of travel, counsel must seek modification of the budget from the court in
23
addition to obtaining a travel authorization form from the CJA Administrator.
24
5.
The Travel Request and Authorization Form enables CJA counsel to receive air
25
travel at government rates paid directly from CJA funds. Counsel are expected to request
26
authorization for air travel through the CJA Administrator in sufficient time to obtain low cost
27
advance fare for air travel or to provide justification why an advance fare could not be obtained.
28
In no case will counsel be reimbursed for first-class travel expenses. Counsel may make their
6
1
own reservations for air travel and seek reimbursement on a CJA voucher, but reimbursement will
2
be limited to the available government rates.
3
6.
The court will approve reimbursement for actual food and lodging expenses for
4
out of town travel on case-related business, subject to the maximum established area per diem
5
rate. Current travel and subsistence allowances are available on the GSA website, www.gsa.gov,
6
under Per Diem rates, or from the CJA Administrator.
7
7.
Counsel will be reimbursed for the actual cost of case-related long-distance
8
telephone calls. The court will not authorize payment for any surcharges or for general telephone
9
service. Facsimile transmissions are reimbursable for the actual amount of the telephone charge.
10
8.
Counsel will be reimbursed for the actual out-of-pocket expenses incurred in
11
photocopying, up to a maximum of 10 cents per page. Counsel will be expected to send
12
documents over 100 pages in length to an outside copying service, unless counsel=s in-house
13
photocopying is more economically efficient.
14
9.
The court will authorize reimbursement for the actual cost of case-related regular
15
U.S. postage. The court will approve reimbursement for the actual cost of other postal services or
16
the use of non-federal carriers (such as overnight or two-day delivery) only if circumstances
17
require the use of such services. If counsel utilize expedited delivery services, a statement
18
detailing the necessity of such delivery must be submitted with the itemized bill. Counsel are to
19
make every effort to use regular U.S. mail and e-mail via the Internet whenever possible. The
20
court may modify this rule if counsel make excessive use of costly overnight carriers.
21
10.
The court will not reimburse counsel for the following expenditures:
22
a. General office overhead; including cellular telephone maintenance fees;
23
b. Books or other publications;
24
c. Flat-fee computer research plans
25
d. General law office supplies and equipment;
26
e. Travel, attendance, registration, or material costs related to educational
27
28
seminars.
/////
7
1
VOUCHER PROCEDURES
2
1.
All payment vouchers shall be submitted in the e-voucher format to CJA
3
Administrator Kurt Heiser. Questions regarding the e-voucher system should be directed to Mr.
4
Heiser at (916) 498-5700 or kurt_heiser@fd.org.
5
2.
All vouchers are reviewed for reasonableness. In addition, fees or expenses which
6
exceed the authorized budget or the limits set forth herein are subject to reduction without further
7
notice or explanation.
8
9
3.
Counsel shall submit vouchers covering services from the commencement to the
completion of each budgeted phase, on a monthly basis. Generally, vouchers should extend from
10
the first to the last day of each month, except when combined attorney=s fees and expenses total
11
less than $1,000 for any given month. In that event, the fees and expenses for that month may be
12
combined with the fees and expenses incurred the following month. If a budgeted phase
13
commences mid-month, the voucher may extend to the end of the following month. Similarly, if
14
the budgeted phase is completed mid-month, the voucher will extend to that date. All vouchers
15
are to be submitted within the first ten days of the month following the last day of service
16
reported. All fees and expenses for a particular time period should be submitted on the same
17
voucher to the extent possible (e.g., travel and administrative expenses).
18
4.
The court expects counsel to submit vouchers within 90 days of the services
19
provided, absent prior arrangements made with the court for a later submission. Without prior
20
court approval, vouchers will not be processed for services rendered more than one-year prior to
21
the date of submission of the voucher.
22
5.
Voucher timesheets shall specifically describe the work performed, the time
23
allotted to each specific task, reported to one-tenth (.1) of an hour. Descriptions should not be
24
vague or general. Each time entry shall reflect discrete, individual tasks and shall not simply list
25
multiple tasks performed in a specified block of time. Information should be provided in
26
sufficient detail so as to permit meaningful review, including: identification of individual
27
witnesses interviewed; identification, by name or title, of persons involved in telephone
28
////
8
1
conversations or conferences; specific topics researched; and identification of pleadings drafted or
2
reviewed.
3
6.
In the event that in-court transcripts of non-evidentiary hearings are requested by
4
petitioner, petitioner=s counsel should arrange with the court reporter(s) to bill the court directly
5
through the use of a CJA Form 24. Counsel shall not include the cost of transcripts as an
6
out-of-pocket expense on a CJA Form 30.
7
7.
Services provided by counsel=s non-attorney employees may be listed as an
8
expense on counsel=s CJA Form 30. Independent contractor paralegal services, like investigator
9
and expert services, should be billed on a CJA Form 31. Petitioner=s counsel shall adhere to these
10
procedures and policies for the preparation of budgets for each phase of these proceedings and for
11
the preparation and submission of all payment vouchers.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9
1
Appendix B
2
3
RATE JUSTIFICATION WORKSHEET
4
5
6
A. Attorney Name and Address: ______________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
7
8
9
B. Experience and Qualifications:
Admitted to practice: _____ years.
10
Member of the bar of a federal district court or court of appeals: _____ years.
11
Primary area of practice: _________________________
12
Has previously represented a client in (check all that apply):
13
[ ] Direct appeal of a death sentence
14
[ ] State capital post-conviction proceeding
15
[ ] Direct appeal of a non-capital homicide conviction
16
[ ] Capital trial
17
[ ] Non-capital homicide trial
18
[ ] Other felony trial
19
[ ] Non-capital federal habeas corpus
20
[ ] Federal capital habeas proceeding
21
Number of clients previously represented in federal habeas actions: __________
22
Most recently authorized hourly rate in such a case: __________
23
Approximate hours spent in training programs on death penalty litigation and/or post-
24
conviction representation: __________
25
C. Other Relevant Information:
26
27
28
10
1
D. Rate Sought: __________________
2
For maximum allowable rates, counsel shall refer to the Ninth Circuit Judicial Council=s
3
costs policies for capital habeas cases. Current cost policies are available on this court=s website
4
at www.caed.uscourts.gov, under Forms, CJA Capital Habeas Forms.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
11
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?