Haynes v. Social Security

Filing 41

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 12/7/2011 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees in the amount of five thousand, one hundred dollars and zero cents ($5,100.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT, IL SBN 6191786 Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration DAVID W. LERCH, CSBN 229411 Special Assistant United States Attorney 333 Market Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8936 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: David.Lerch@ssa.gov 7 Attorneys for Defendant 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 TIFFANY NICOLE HAYNES, Plaintiff, ) ) CIVIL NO. 2:03-CV-00497-JFM ) ) ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________) v. STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT 18 19 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned counsel, 20 subject to the Court’s approval, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice 21 Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of FIVE THOUSAND, ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS 22 AND ZERO CENTS ($5,100.00). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered 23 on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 24 § 2412(d). 25 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the government will 26 consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff’s attorney. 27 Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (U.S. June 14, 2010), the ability to honor the assignment 28 Stip. & Proposed Order Settling Fees 1 will depend on whether the fees and expenses are subject to any offset allowed under the United States 2 Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees and expenses is entered, 3 the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset. 4 Fees and expenses shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury 5 determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of 6 fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Bess M. Brewer, pursuant to the assignment executed by 7 Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel. 8 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA attorney fees 9 and expenses, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA. 10 Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims 11 that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees and expenses in 12 connection with this action. 13 14 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff’s counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA. 15 16 Dated: November 29, 2011 /s/ Bess M. Brewer (As authorized via email) 17 BESS M. BREWER Attorney for Plaintiff 18 19 20 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 21 22 23 Dated: November 30, 2011 By: /s/ David Lerch DAVID LERCH Special Assistant United States Attorney 24 25 26 27 28 Stip. & Proposed Order Settling Fees 2 1 2 3 4 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees in the amount of FIVE THOUSAND, ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS ($5,100.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. 5 6 Dated: December 7, 2011. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stip. & Proposed Order Settling Fees 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?