Haynes v. Social Security
Filing
41
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 12/7/2011 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees in the amount of five thousand, one hundred dollars and zero cents ($5,100.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT, IL SBN 6191786
Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
DAVID W. LERCH, CSBN 229411
Special Assistant United States Attorney
333 Market Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8936
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: David.Lerch@ssa.gov
7
Attorneys for Defendant
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
TIFFANY NICOLE HAYNES,
Plaintiff,
)
)
CIVIL NO. 2:03-CV-00497-JFM
)
)
)
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
)
Commissioner of
)
Social Security,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_________________________________)
v.
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
APPROVING SETTLEMENT OF
ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE
EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT
18
19
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned counsel,
20
subject to the Court’s approval, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice
21
Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of FIVE THOUSAND, ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS
22
AND ZERO CENTS ($5,100.00). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered
23
on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C.
24
§ 2412(d).
25
After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the government will
26
consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff’s attorney.
27
Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (U.S. June 14, 2010), the ability to honor the assignment
28
Stip. & Proposed Order Settling Fees
1
will depend on whether the fees and expenses are subject to any offset allowed under the United States
2
Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees and expenses is entered,
3
the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.
4
Fees and expenses shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury
5
determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of
6
fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Bess M. Brewer, pursuant to the assignment executed by
7
Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel.
8
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA attorney fees
9
and expenses, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA.
10
Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims
11
that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees and expenses in
12
connection with this action.
13
14
This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff’s counsel to seek Social Security Act
attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA.
15
16
Dated: November 29, 2011
/s/ Bess M. Brewer
(As authorized via email)
17
BESS M. BREWER
Attorney for Plaintiff
18
19
20
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
21
22
23
Dated: November 30, 2011
By: /s/ David Lerch
DAVID LERCH
Special Assistant United States Attorney
24
25
26
27
28
Stip. & Proposed Order Settling Fees
2
1
2
3
4
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees in
the amount of FIVE THOUSAND, ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS ($5,100.00), as
authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation.
5
6
Dated: December 7, 2011.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stip. & Proposed Order Settling Fees
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?