Williams v. Pliler, et al

Filing 86

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 09/11/12 granting 81 Motion to Seal documents. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD ALEX WILLIAMS, Case No. 2:03-CV-00721 LKK JFM (HC) 12 13 v. Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S REQUEST TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 14 15 C.K. PLILER, Warden, et al., 16 Respondent. 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner represented by counsel. Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of 18 Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Respondent has filed a request to seal confidential 19 documents. 20 Local Rule 141 allows the Court to seal documents only upon written order of the Court 21 and upon the showing required by applicable law. See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, 26(c). Upon 22 reviewing the request, the Court will file in the publicly available case file an order granting or 23 denying the request. However, the order shall identity the documents for which sealing has been 24 granted or denied without revealing its contents. Local Rule 141(d). 25 Generally, the contents of sealed documents are of a nature that require the Court to 26 maintain the confidentiality of the document. Here, the state superior court has redacted the 27 28 1 Order (2:03-CV-00721 JFM LKK (HC)) 1 names from the juror questionnaires in order to keep the identity of prospective jurors, seated 2 jurors and alternate jurors confidential. This Court shall respect their privacy interest. 3 Based on the showing of good cause, Respondent’s Request to File and Seal Documents is 4 GRANTED. 5 Date: 9/11/2012 6 7 ______________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 14;will0721.seal DEAC_Sign 11 12 9cekb3i 13 9cekb3i 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Order (2:03-CV-00721 JFM LKK (HC))

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?