Magnan v. Runnels, et al

Filing 234

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/7/2011, and agreed between the parties to DISMISS w/ prejudice this entire action prusuant to Rule 41(a)(2). CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

3

WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES
1250 Sutterville Road, Ste. 290
Sacramento, CA 95822
[phone]
[phone] (fax)

4

Kathleen J. Williams, CSB #127021

5

Attorneys for defendant
EVANS

1
2

6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9

PAUL MAGNAN,
Plaintiff,

10
11

v.

12

DAVID L. RUNNELS, et al. and
DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,

13
Defendants.
14
15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO: S 03-1099 GEB CKD P
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND
ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff PAUL MAGNAN requests an order of dismissal with prejudice as to the

16

entire action. Defendants EVANS and BRIDDLE, by and through their attorneys of

17

record, stipulate to the dismissal of this case, with prejudice. The whereabouts of pro

18

se defendant TONYA VOROS is unknown; hence, the order for a dismissal with

19

prejudice of the entire action is being sought pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2).

20

Dated: September 28, 2011

WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES

21
By: /s/ Kathleen J. Williams
KATHLEEN J. WILLIAMS, CSB 127021
Attorneys for defendant EVANS

22
23
24
25
26

Dated: September 28, 2011

LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP
By: /s/ Jennifer Marquez (signed with permission )
JENNIFER MARQUEZ, CSB 232194
Attorneys for defendant BRIDDLE

27
28

Magnan v. Runnels, et al. [CIV-S-03-1099 GEB CKD P] Stipulation and Order of Dismissal

Page 1

1

Dated: September 28, 2011

LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY PRICE

2
By: /s/ Jeffrey Price (signed with permission)
JEFFREY PRICE, CSB 165534
Attorneys for plaintiff PAUL MAGNAN

3
4
5
6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED
Dated: October 7, 2011
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Magnan v. Runnels, et al. [CIV-S-03-1099 GEB CKD P] Stipulation and Order of Dismissal

Page 2