Technology Licensing v. Technicolor USA, Inc.

Filing 299

STIPULATION and ORDER 298 for continuance signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 9/2/2010. Defendant Technicolor USA's 295 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Hearing is RE-SCHEDULED for 10/12/2010 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS). Plaintiff's Opposition will be due on 9/28/2010 and defendant's Reply will be due on 10/5/2010. (Marciel, M)

Technology Licensing v. Technicolor USA, Inc.

Doc. 299

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Audrey A. Millemann, State Bar No. 124954 Weintraub Genshlea Chediak Law Corporation 400 Capitol Mall, 11th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 [phone] ­ Main [phone] ­ Facsimile Raymond P. Niro Joseph N. Hosteny Arthur A. Gasey Paul C. Gibbons Kara L. Szpondowski Niro, Haller & Niro 181 West Madison Street, Suite 4600 Chicago, Illinois 60602 [phone] ­ Telephone [phone] ­ Facsimile Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Technology Licensing Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TECHNOLOGY LICENSING CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff, v. TECHNICOLOR USA, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. ) ) ) Case No. CIV S-03-1329 WBS PAN ) STIPULATION AND ORDER RE ) CONTINUANCE OF HEARING DATE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Pursuant to Local Rules 230(f), 143, and 144, plaintiff and defendant, by their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to and request a continuance of the hearing date for defendant Technicolor USA, Inc.'s Rule 12(c) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on Plaintiff's Claims of Inducing and Contributory Infringement, docket no. 295, presently set for September 27, 2010 at 2:00 p.m., to October 12, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. Plaintiff's counsel has asked defendant's counsel to agree to this continuance because plaintiff's opposition to defendant's motion is currently due on September 10, 2010 and plaintiff's counsel will be in trial on another matter from September 8,

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

2010 through the following week. Defendant's counsel has agreed to this continuance. This requested continuance would not interfere with the Court's Scheduling Order, nor would it necessitate a change to the trial date or the final pretrial conference. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that good cause exists for continuing the hearing on defendant's Rule 12(c) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on Plaintiff's Claims of Inducing and Contributory Infringement to October 12, 2010, the next available law and motion date. Plaintiff's opposition will be due on September 28, 2010 and defendant's reply will be due on October 5, 2010. Respectfully submitted, Dated: September 1, 2010 NIRO, HALLER & NIRO By: /s/ Arthur A. Gasey Raymond P. Niro Joseph N. Hosteny Arthur A. Gasey Paul C. Gibbons Kara L. Szpondowski

WEINTRAUB GENSHLEA CHEDIAK Law Corporation By: /s/ Audrey A. Millemann Audrey A. Millemann Attorneys for Plaintiff Dated: September 1, 2010 DUANE MORRIS LLP By: /s/ Richard T. Redano Richard T. Redano Gary R. Maze J. Donald McCarthy (SBN 69864) Christina C. Marshall (SBN 2093150) Attorneys for Defendant

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DATE: September 2, 2010 IT IS SO ORDERED.

ORDER