Grayson, et al v. Carey

Filing 68

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 07/06/10 ordering that petitioner's reply points and authorities will be due 08/18/10. (Plummer, M)

(HC) Grayson, et al v. Carey

Doc. 68

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Tim Warriner (SB#166128) Attorney at Law 813 6th St., Suite 450 Sacramento, CA 95814 [phone] Attorney for petitioner, ALFRED LEE GRAYSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTSRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) Case No. Civ. S-03-1694 MCE KJM ) ) STIPULATION AND ORDER RE ) BRIEFING SCHEDULE ) ) ) ) ) )

Alfred Lee Grayson,
9

Petitioner,
10

vs.
11

Tom L Carey, Warden,
12

Respondent.
13 14 15 16 17

This matter is in the District Court after remand from the Ninth Circuit. Pursuant to the remand order, the court is to

consider the issue of procedural default, and if there is no procedural default, is to evaluate the confrontation clause

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1

claim pursuant to Ohio v. Roberts, 448 U.S. 56 (1980). Respondent filed a response to petitioner's points and authorities on April 19, 2010. Petitioner's counsel is in trial

now in Sacramento County and needs additional time to complete briefing. Petitioner and respondent, through their counsel,

hereby stipulate and agree that the due date for petitioner's reply points and authorities be continued to August 18, 2010.

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

DATED: July 1, 2010

/s/ Tim Warriner, Attorney for Petitioner, Alfred Grayson /s/ Janis McLean, Deputy Attorney General

DATED: July 1, 2010

ORDER GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ordered that petitioner's reply points

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

and authorities will be due August 18, 2010. DATED: July 6, 2010