Jordan v. Terhune, et al

Filing 251

AMENDED ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/18/09 AMENDING 250 Order; ORDERING that plaintiff's motion for an extension of time 249 is GRANTED; Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order in which to file and serve an opposition to defendants motion for summary judgment. Defendants' reply, if any, shall be filed seven days thereafter; and plaintiffs opposition is subject to the page limits established in the 180 order.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2/mp jord1820.36(2) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOHN JORDAN, Plaintiff, vs. CAL A. TERHUNE, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file and serve an opposition to defendant's October 21, 2009 motion for summary judgment. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (Docket No. 249) is granted; 2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file and serve an opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment. Defendants' reply, if any, shall be filed seven days thereafter; and 3. Plaintiff's opposition is subject to the page limits established in the order of October 9, 2007 (docket no. 180). DATED: November 18, 2009. ORDER No. CIV S-03-1820 LKK KJM P

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?