Jordan v. Terhune, et al

Filing 257

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/20/2010 ORDERING that the 255 findings and recommendations filed July 1, 2010 are adopted in full and Defendant Brown's 247 renewed motion for summary judgment is DENIED. (Duong, D)

Download PDF
(PC) Jordan v. Terhune, et al Doc. 257 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. CAL. A TERHUNE, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On July 1, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Defendants have filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOHN JORDAN, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-03-1820 LKK KJM P ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 is denied. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 1, 2010 are adopted in full; and 2. Defendant Brown's renewed motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 247) DATED: September 20, 2010. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?