Young v. Pulsipher, et al
ORDER denying 185 Motion to Enforce the settlement signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/08/10. (Plummer, M)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. J. PULSIPHER, et al., Defendants. / On February 19, 2010, this case was closed after the parties filed a stipulation for voluntary dismissal, stemming from the settlement of the case. On September 14, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion to enforce the settlement agreement, alleging that he had not received the monetary settlement underlying the stipulation for dismissal. He quoted the agreement, which expressly notified him that payment might be delayed beyond the 180 days if there was a delay in adopting the state budget. Docket No. 185 at 1, 4. Defendants have filed a notice that with the adoption of the budget, the settlement money has been sent to plaintiff. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion to enforce the settlement (docket no. 185) is denied. DATED: November 8, 2010.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DANNY GEROME YOUNG, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-03-2225 KJM P
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?