Brooks v. Alameida, et al
Filing
140
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/28/2009 DENYING as premature 119 Motion in Limine. (Matson, R)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, et al., Defendants. / On May 2, 2008, plaintiff filed a motion in limine seeking to exclude from trial evidence of his prior and/or current convictions or arrests. On May 13, 2008, defendant Rohlfing filed an opposition brief. The motion is premature. If and when a pretrial order issues later in these proceedings, a briefing schedule will be set with respect to motions in limine, such as this motion. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's May 2, 2008, motion in limine is denied without prejudice as premature. DATED: January 28, 2009. ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JAMES L. BROOKS, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-03-2343 JAM EFB P
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
