Brooks v. Alameida, et al

Filing 170

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/23/10: Settlement Conference set for 9/27/2010 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. The parties are to appear with full settlement authority. The parties are directed to exchange non-confidential settlement statements seven days prior to this settlement conference. (Kaminski, H)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 28, 2010, plaintiff submitted a confidential settlement conference statement as directed by the court on March 24, 2010 and May 10, 2010. The court will therefore reschedule a settlement conference in this action. This case will be referred to Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman to conduct a settlement conference on September 27, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 25. A separate order and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum issues concurrently. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This case is set for settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on September 27, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. at the U.S. District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, in Courtroom No. 25. 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JAMES L. BROOKS, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-03-2343 JAM EFB P

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

2. The parties are to appear with full settlement authority. 3. The parties are directed to exchange non-confidential settlement statements seven days prior to this settlement conference. These statements shall simultaneously be delivered to the court using the following email address: [e-mail]. Plaintiff shall either mail or deliver his settlement statement to the Clerk's Office, located on the 4th Floor. If a party desires to share additional confidential information with the court, they may do so pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 270(d) and (e). DATED: June 23, 2010.

2