Chatman v. Felker, et al

Filing 159

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 02/16/12 ordering Motion for writs of habeas corpus ad testificandum 154 is moot. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CHARLES JAMES CHATMAN 10 Plaintiff, 11 No. CIV S-03-2415 JAM CKD P vs. 12 T. FELKER, et al. 13 Defendant. 14 ORDER / 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action under 42 16 U.S.C. § 1983. He has moved the court to issue writs of habeas corpus ad testificandum ordering 17 prison officials to produce him and three other prisoners, whom he will present as witnesses, at 18 the trial of this matter. Trial is set to commence May 7, 2012. 19 The court’s custom is to issue the appropriate writs for incarcerated litigants and 20 witnesses sua sponte. The court will follow that custom in procuring plaintiff’s attendance at 21 trial. As for the proposed witnesses, the court will determine whether they are necessary for trial 22 and will make that determination known in its pre-trial order. If the court finds that they are 23 necessary witnesses, the court will issue writs for their attendance at trial as well. For now, 24 though, the plaintiff’s motion must be denied as moot. 25 //// 26 //// 1 1 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for writs of habeas corpus ad testificandum (Docket No. 154) is moot. 3 Dated: February 16, 2012 4 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 3 chat2415.ord 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?