Chatman v. Felker, et al
Filing
199
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/03/13 VACATING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM for Louis Peets. The clerk of court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Warden, of High Desert State Prison and the Out-to-Court Desk, CSP-Sacramento. (cc: OTCD) (Plummer, M)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CHARLES CHATMAN,
Plaintiff,
No. 2:03-cv-2415 JAM CKD P
vs.
T. FELKER, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER VACATING WRIT OF HABEAS
CORPUS AD TESTIFCANDUM
/
On the plaintiff’s request filed with this court on January 2, 2013 (Dkt. No. 196),
Louis Peets, inmate # T-56974, confined in High Desert State Prison, 475-750 Rice Canyon
Road, P.O. Box 750, Susanville, California, 96127-0750, is no longer a necessary and material
witness in proceedings in this case on January 28, 2013. Accordingly the court’s Order and Writ
of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issued December 14, 2012 to secure this inmate’s attendance
is hereby vacated.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issued December 14, 2012 (Dkt.
No. 194), under the seal of this court, commanding the Warden to produce the inmate named
above to testify in United States District Court at the time and place above is hereby VACATED;
2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a courtesy copy of this order
vacating writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum on the Warden at High Desert State Prison, 475750 Rice Canyon Road, P.O. Box 750, Susanville, California, 96127-0750; and
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a courtesy copy of this order
vacating writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum on the Out-To-Court Desk, California State
Prison - Sacramento, P.O. Box 290007, Represa, California 95671.
ORDER VACATING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM
Dated: January 3, 2013
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
chat2415.vacatewrit3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?