Chatman v. Felker, et al

Filing 96

ORDER signed by Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 2/1/08 ORDERING that theFINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS filed 11/27/07 87 are ADOPTED in full. Plaintiff's 7/10/07 MOTION for Injunctive Relief 69 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
(PC) Chatman v. Felker, et al Doc. 96 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. T. FELKER, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On November 27, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHARLES CHATMAN, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-03-2415 RRB KJM P ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 chat2415.801 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 27, 2007, are adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff's July 10, 2007 motion for injunctive relief is denied. DATED: 2/1/2008 /s/ Ralph R. Beistline UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?