Norwood v. Alameida, et al

Filing 216

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 2/3/2012 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 213 are ADOPTED in FULL; Plaintiff's motion for relief from judgment # 197 is DENIED; the motion to augment the record # 199 is DENIED; and the motion for an evidentiary hearing and for appointment of aninvestigator # 212 is DENIED as MOOT. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

GREGORY LYNN NORWOOD,

11
12
13
14

Plaintiff,
vs.
STEVE J. VANCE, et al.,
Defendants.

15
16

No. CIV S-03-2554 GEB GGH P

ORDER
/

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

17

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

18

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

19

On December 15, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

20

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

21

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff

22

has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

23

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule

24

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

25

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

26

proper analysis.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 15, 2011, are adopted in

3

full;

4

2. The motion for relief from judgment (Doc. No. 197) is denied;

5

3. The motion to augment the record (Doc. No. 199) is denied; and

6

4. The motion for an evidentiary hearing and for appointment of an

7

investigator (Doc. No. 212) is denied as moot.

8

Dated: February 3, 2012

9
10
11

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2