Mansourian, et al v. Regents Davis, et al

Filing 629

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 8/9/2011 ORDERING that dfts' 524 motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's discovery order re: punitive damages and dfts' Rule 52(c) motion (made orally on the record on 6/14/2011) are MOOT. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 13 AREZOU MANSOURIAN; LAUREN MANCUSO; NANCY NIEN-LI CHIANG; CHRISTINE WING-SI NG; and all those similarly situated, NO. CIV. S-03-2591 FCD EFB 14 15 16 17 18 Plaintiffs, v. ORDER re: Pending Motions BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA at DAVIS; LAWRENCE “LARRY” VANDERHOEF; GREG WARZECKA; PAM GILL-FISHER; ROBERT FRANKS; and LAWRENCE SWANSON, 19 Defendants. 20 ----oo0oo---21 In light of the court’s August 3, 2011 Findings of Fact and 22 Conclusions of Law (Docket #628), resolving the liability phase 23 of this case, the following pending motions are rendered moot: 24 (1) defendants’ motion for reconsideration of the magistrate 25 judge’s discovery order re: punitive damages (Docket #524) and 26 (2) defendants’ Rule 52(c) motion (made orally on the record on 27 28 1 1 2 3 June 14, 2011 [Docket #615]). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 9, 2011 4 5 6 FRANK C. DAMRELL, Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?