Mansourian, et al v. Regents Davis, et al
Filing
629
ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 8/9/2011 ORDERING that dfts' 524 motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's discovery order re: punitive damages and dfts' Rule 52(c) motion (made orally on the record on 6/14/2011) are MOOT. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
----oo0oo----
11
12
13
AREZOU MANSOURIAN; LAUREN
MANCUSO; NANCY NIEN-LI
CHIANG; CHRISTINE WING-SI NG;
and all those similarly
situated,
NO. CIV. S-03-2591 FCD EFB
14
15
16
17
18
Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER re: Pending Motions
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
at DAVIS; LAWRENCE “LARRY”
VANDERHOEF; GREG WARZECKA;
PAM GILL-FISHER; ROBERT
FRANKS; and LAWRENCE SWANSON,
19
Defendants.
20
----oo0oo---21
In light of the court’s August 3, 2011 Findings of Fact and
22
Conclusions of Law (Docket #628), resolving the liability phase
23
of this case, the following pending motions are rendered moot:
24
(1) defendants’ motion for reconsideration of the magistrate
25
judge’s discovery order re: punitive damages (Docket #524) and
26
(2) defendants’ Rule 52(c) motion (made orally on the record on
27
28
1
1
2
3
June 14, 2011 [Docket #615]).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: August 9, 2011
4
5
6
FRANK C. DAMRELL, Jr.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?