Mansourian, et al v. Regents Davis, et al
Filing
657
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/18/2012 STAYING case until 1/20/2012. A Joint Status Report is due at that time. (Michel, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Nancy J. Sheehan, SBN 109419
David P.E. Burkett, SBN 241896
350 University Avenue, Suite 200
Sacramento, California 95825
(916) 929-1481
(916) 927-3706 (facsimile)
Attorneys for Defendants: REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LARRY
VANDERHOEF (erroneously sued as LAWRENCE VANDERHOEF), GREG WARZECKA, PAM
GILL-FISHER, and ROBERT FRANKS
8
9
10
11
12
13
Noreen Farrell, SBN 191600
nfarrrell@equalrights.org
Jamie E. Dolkas, SBN 262289
jdolkas@equalrights.org
EQUAL RIGHTS ADVOCATES
180 Howard Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94105
(415) 621-0672
(415) 621-6744 (facsimile)
14
15
16
Attorneys for Plaintiffs: AREZOU MANSOURIAN, LAUREN MANCUSO, and CHRISTINE
WING-SI NG
Additional Plaintiffs’ Counsel on Signature Page
17
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
20
21
22
AREZOU MANSOURIAN, LAUREN
MANCUSO, NANCY NIEN-LI CHIANG,
and CHRISTINE WING-SI NG; and all
those similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
23
24
25
vs.
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA, et al.,
26
CASE NO. CIV. S-03-2591 KJM/EFB
JOINT
STATUS
REPORT;
STIPULATION
AND
ORDER
REGARDING REQUEST TO MODIFY
SCHEDULING ORDER RE PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS
Complaint Filed:
December 18, 2003
Phase II Trial Date:
March 5, 2012
The Honorable Kimberly J. Mueller
Defendants.
27
28
1
JOINT STATUS REPORT; STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING REQUEST TO MODIFY
SCHEDULING ORDER RE PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS
{00978803.DOC}
1
Since filing the request for stay of proceedings on January 9, 2012 (ECF # 654) and the Court’s
2
approval of the same (ECF # 655), with the assistance of Magistrate Judge Newman counsel for the
3
parties have spent extensive time working on bringing this matter to resolution. The parties and their
4
counsel have a good faith belief that with continued efforts, an agreement on the terms and conditions
5
of settlement should be reached by Friday, January 20, 2012. In the event settlement is not going to be
6
possible, that too should be known by January 20th. Accordingly, the parties request a further stay of
7
proceedings until January 20, 2012, at which time they will file a further Joint Status Report. This
8
further stay will allow the parties and their counsel to focus on settlement efforts, which will eliminate
9
the need for pre-trial motions, a damages phase trial and post-trial motions.
10
11
Dated: January 9, 2012
PORTER SCOTT
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
12
By:/s/ Nancy J. Sheehan_____________
Nancy J. Sheehan
David P.E. Burkett
Attorneys for Defendants
13
14
15
Dated: January 9, 2012
EQUAL RIGHTS ADVOCATES
16
By: /s/ Noreen Farrell (as authorized on 1/17/12)
Noreen Farrell
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
17
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED:
Dated: January 18, 2012
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Additional Plaintiffs’ Counsel
James C. Sturdevant (SBN 94551)
(jsturdevant@sturdevantlaw.com)
THE STURDEVANT LAW FIRM
A Professional Corporation
354 Pine Street, Fourth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 477-2410
Facsimile: (415) 477-2420
2
JOINT STATUS REPORT; STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING REQUEST TO MODIFY
SCHEDULING ORDER RE PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS
{00978803.DOC}
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Monique Olivier (SBN 190385)
(monique@dplolaw.com)
DUCKWORTH PETERS LEBOWITZ OLIVIER LLP
235 Montgomery St., Suite 1010
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415-433-0333
Facsimile: 415-449-6556
Kristen Galles (SBN 148740)
(kgalles@comcast.net)
EQUITY LEGAL
10 Rosecrest Avenue
Alexandria, VA 22301
Telephone: (703) 683-4491
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
JOINT STATUS REPORT; STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING REQUEST TO MODIFY
SCHEDULING ORDER RE PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS
{00978803.DOC}
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?