Nguyen v. Sacramento County, et al

Filing 34

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 3/31/10 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 2/12/10 33 are ADOPTED in full; Defendants' 6/22/09 MOTION to DISMISS 30 is DENIED; Defendants are directed to file an answer within thirty days of this order.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 12, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: ///// 1 ORDER DAI NGUYEN, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-03-2635 FCD EFB P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 full;

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 12, 2010, are adopted in

2. Defendants' June 22, 2009 motion to dismiss is denied; 3. Defendants are directed to file an answer within thirty days of this order. DATED: March 31, 2010.

_______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2