Lewis, et al v. Russell, et al

Filing 344

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 4/14/11: Discovery due by 4/29/2011. Dispositive Motions filed by 5/23/2014. Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/21/2014 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Judge William B. Shubb. Jury Trial set for 9/16/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Judge William B. Shubb. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 CHARLES H. LEWIS and JANE W. LEWIS, NO. CIV. 2:03-2646 WBS GGH 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ROBERT D. RUSSELL; IRENE RUSSELL; BEN J. NEWITT; the Estate of PHILLIP NEWITT, Deceased; JUNG HANG SUH; SOO JUNG SUH; JUNG K. SEO; THE DAVIS CENTER, LLC; MELVIN R. STOVER, individually and as trustee of the Stover Family Trust; EMILY A. STOVER, individually and as trustee of the Stover Family Trust; STOVER FAMILY TRUST; RICHARD ALBERT STINCHFIELD, individually and as successor trustee of the Robert S. Stinchfield Separate Property Revocable Trust, and as trustee of the Barbara Ellen Stinchfield Testamentary Trust; ROBERT S. STINCHFIELD SEPARATE PROPERTY REVOCABLE TRUST; THE BARBARA ELLEN STINCHFIELD TESTAMENTARY TRUST; WORKROOM SUPPLY, INC., a California corporation; SAFETY-KLEEN CORPORATION, 1 1 2 3 California corporation; the CITY OF DAVIS; JENSEN MANUFACTURING COMPANY; VIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY; MARTIN FRANCHISES INC., aka/dba MARTINIZING DRY CLEANING, 4 Defendants, 5 6 / AND RELATED COUNTER-, CROSS-, AND THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS. / 7 8 ----oo0oo---9 STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER 10 After reviewing the parties’ Joint Status Report, the 11 12 court hereby vacates the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference 13 scheduled for April 18, 2011. 14 I. SERVICE OF PROCESS 15 With the exception of cross-defendant Jensen 16 Manufacturing Company--which the parties believe has dissolved 17 and filed Chapter 7 Bankruptcy--all named defendants and third- 18 party defendants have been served and no further service is 19 permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown 20 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). 21 II. JOINDER OF PARTIES/AMENDMENTS 22 No further joinder of parties or amendments to 23 pleadings will be permitted except with leave of court, good 24 cause having been shown under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25 16(b). 26 (9th Cir. 1992). See Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 27 III. JURISDICTION/VENUE 28 Jurisdiction is predicated upon federal question 2 1 jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, because plaintiffs have brought 2 claims under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 3 Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601- 4 9675. 5 to plaintiffs’ claims occurred in this district. 6 1391(b). Venue is found to be proper because the events giving rise 28 U.S.C. § DISCOVERY1 7 IV. 8 Initial disclosures as required by Federal Rule of 9 Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) having been made before the case was 10 stayed, the parties shall serve supplemental or amended 11 disclosures by no later than April 29, 2011. 12 The parties shall disclose experts and produce reports 13 in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) by no 14 later than September 13, 2013. 15 intended solely for rebuttal, those experts shall be disclosed 16 and reports produced in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil 17 Procedure 26(a)(2) on or before November 15, 2013. With regard to expert testimony 18 All discovery, including depositions for preservation 19 of testimony, is left open, save and except that it shall be so 20 conducted as to be completed by March 21, 2014. 21 “completed” means that all discovery shall have been conducted so 22 that all depositions have been taken and any disputes relevant to The word 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 The court declines the parties’ suggestion to simply set a further status conference for November due the complexity of the case (and the fact that despite commencing in 2003, the case has been stayed for most of its life). Instead, the court has given the parties. Those dates go through 2014, which gives the parties more time than should be necessary to get this case ready for trial. There is no reason to grant defendant Vic Manufacturing Company’s request to stay discovery until after it moves for judgment on the pleadings. 3 1 discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if 2 necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has 3 been obeyed. 4 the magistrate judge’s calendar in accordance with the local 5 rules of this court and so that such motions may be heard (and 6 any resulting orders obeyed) not later than March 21, 2014. All motions to compel discovery must be noticed on 7 V. 8 All motions, except motions for continuances, temporary 9 MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE restraining orders, or other emergency applications, shall be 10 filed on or before May 23, 2014. All motions shall be noticed 11 for the next available hearing date. 12 refer to the local rules regarding the requirements for noticing 13 and opposing such motions on the court’s regularly scheduled law 14 and motion calendar. Counsel are cautioned to 15 VI. FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE 16 The Final Pretrial Conference is set for July 21, 2014, 17 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom No. 5. 18 attended by at least one of the attorneys who will conduct the 19 trial for each of the parties and by any unrepresented parties. 20 The conference shall be Counsel for all parties are to be fully prepared for 21 trial at the time of the Pretrial Conference, with no matters 22 remaining to be accomplished except production of witnesses for 23 oral testimony. 24 and are referred to Local Rules 281 and 282 relating to the 25 contents of and time for filing those statements. 26 those subjects listed in Local Rule 281(b), the parties are to 27 provide the court with: (1) a plain, concise statement which 28 identifies every non-discovery motion which has been made to the Counsel shall file separate pretrial statements, 4 In addition to 1 court, and its resolution; (2) a list of the remaining claims as 2 against each defendant; and (3) the estimated number of trial 3 days. 4 In providing the plain, concise statements of 5 undisputed facts and disputed factual issues contemplated by 6 Local Rule 281(b)(3)-(4), the parties shall emphasize the claims 7 that remain at issue, and any remaining affirmatively pled 8 defenses thereto. 9 parties shall also prepare a succinct statement of the case, 10 If the case is to be tried to a jury, the which is appropriate for the court to read to the jury. 11 VII. 12 The jury trial is set for September 16, 2014, at 9:00 13 a.m. 14 TRIAL SETTING The parties estimate that the trial will last sixty court days. 15 VIII. SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 16 A Settlement Conference will be set at the time of the 17 Pretrial Conference. 18 the court whether they will stipulate to the trial judge acting 19 as settlement judge and waive disqualification by virtue thereof. 20 All parties should be prepared to advise Counsel are instructed to have a principal with full 21 settlement authority present at the Settlement Conference or to 22 be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms. 23 seven calendar days before the Settlement Conference counsel for 24 each party shall submit a confidential Settlement Conference 25 Statement for review by the settlement judge. 26 judge is not the trial judge, the Settlement Conference 27 Statements shall not be filed and will not otherwise be disclosed 28 to the trial judge. 5 At least If the settlement 1 IX. MODIFICATIONS TO SCHEDULING ORDER 2 Any requests to modify the dates or terms of this 3 Scheduling Order, except requests to change the date of the 4 trial, may be heard and decided by the assigned Magistrate Judge. 5 All requests to change the trial date shall be heard and decided 6 only by the undersigned judge. 7 DATED: April 14, 2011 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?