Lewis, et al v. Russell, et al
Filing
403
STIPULATION and ORDER for Dismissal with prejudice of Defendant/Third Party Defendant Martin Franchises, Inc. 402 signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 7/10/2012. (Kirksey Smith, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Chad N. Dunigan, Esq. (SBN 204946)
Sara J. Dresser, Esq. (SBN 265743)
KOELLER, NEBEKER, CARLSON & HALUCK, LLP
1478 Stone Point Drive, Suite 400
Roseville, CA 95661
(916) 724-5700
(916) 788-2850 Facsimile
Attorneys for Defendants/Cross-Complainants/
Third Party Plaintiffs,
THE DAVIS CENTER, LLC; EMILY STOVER,
Individually and as Trustee of the STOVER FAMILY
TRUST and as Personal Representative for Melvin Stover
(Deceased); and RICHARD ALBERT STINCHFIELD,
Individually and as Trustee of the ROBERT S.
STINCHFIELD SEPARATE REAL PROPERTY TRUST
and as Trustee of the BARBARA ELLEN STINCHFIELD
TESTAMENTARY TRUST
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION
13
CHARLES LEWIS,
14
Case No. CIV S-03-2646 WBS KJM
Plaintiff,
15
v.
16
STIPULATION FOR ORDER OF
DISMISSAL
ROBERT RUSSELL, et al.,
[F.R.C.P. Rule 41(a)]
17
Defendants.
Trial Date: September 16, 2014
18
AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS.
19
20
Defendants/Complainants/Third Party Plaintiffs, THE DAVIS CENTER, LLC; EMILY
21
STOVER, Individually and as Trustee of the STOVER FAMILY TRUST and as Personal
22
Representative for Melvin Stover (Deceased); and RICHARD ALBERT STINCHFIELD,
23
Individually and as Trustee of the ROBERT S. STINCHFIELD SEPARATE REAL PROPERTY
24
TRUST and as Trustee of the BARBARA ELLEN STINCHFIELD TESTAMENTARY TRUST
25
(collectively, “THE DAVIS CENTER”) and Defendant/Third Party Defendant MARTIN
26
FRANCHISES, INC., through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate to the following:
27
That THE DAVIS CENTER’s claims in its First Amended Third-Party Complaint filed on
28
or about September 6, 2007 in the above entitled action (“Claims”) be dismissed as against
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
1
MARTIN FRANCHISES, INC. only, with prejudice, according to the terms of a Mutual Release
2
of Claims (the “Release”) entered into by and between THE DAVIS CENTER and MARTIN
3
FRANCHISES, INC. and having an effective date of June 21, 2012.
4
DATED: July 3, 2012
KOELLER, NEBEKER, CARLSON & HALUCK, LLP
5
/s/ Chad N. Dunigan
6
Chad N. Dunigan, Esq.
Sara J. Dresser, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendants/Cross-Complainants/
Third Party Plaintiffs,
THE DAVIS CENTER, LLC; EMILY STOVER,
Individually and as Trustee of the STOVER FAMILY
TRUST and as Personal Representative for Melvin Stover
(Deceased); and RICHARD ALBERT STINCHFIELD,
Individually and as Trustee of the ROBERT S.
STINCHFIELD SEPARATE REAL PROPERTY TRUST
and as Trustee of the BARBARA ELLEN STINCHFIELD
TESTAMENTARY TRUST
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
DATED: July 5, 2012
GORDON & REESE, LLP
15
/s/ Matthew P. Nugent
________________________________________________
Matthew P. Nugent, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant/Third Party Defendant,
MARTIN FRANCHISES, INC.
16
17
18
19
20
21
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
The Court, having reviewed and considered the stipulation set forth above and good cause
appearing, issues the following Order:
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that THE DAVIS CENTER’s Claims in the above-entitled
23
action be, and hereby are, dismissed as against MARTIN FRANCHISES, INC. only, with
24
prejudice.
25
IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that the dismissal is expressly conditioned
26
upon the terms and conditions of the Release entered into by and between THE DAVIS CENTER
27
and MARTIN FRANCHISES, INC. on June 21, 2012.
28
IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that the Court retains jurisdiction of this matter
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
1
2
3
for the sole purpose of taking any action needed to enforce the terms of the Release.
IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that each of the parties hereto shall bear its
own costs, including attorney’s fees, as provided in the Release.
4
5
Date: July 10, 2012
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?