Lewis, et al v. Russell, et al

Filing 403

STIPULATION and ORDER for Dismissal with prejudice of Defendant/Third Party Defendant Martin Franchises, Inc. 402 signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 7/10/2012. (Kirksey Smith, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Chad N. Dunigan, Esq. (SBN 204946) Sara J. Dresser, Esq. (SBN 265743) KOELLER, NEBEKER, CARLSON & HALUCK, LLP 1478 Stone Point Drive, Suite 400 Roseville, CA 95661 (916) 724-5700 (916) 788-2850 Facsimile Attorneys for Defendants/Cross-Complainants/ Third Party Plaintiffs, THE DAVIS CENTER, LLC; EMILY STOVER, Individually and as Trustee of the STOVER FAMILY TRUST and as Personal Representative for Melvin Stover (Deceased); and RICHARD ALBERT STINCHFIELD, Individually and as Trustee of the ROBERT S. STINCHFIELD SEPARATE REAL PROPERTY TRUST and as Trustee of the BARBARA ELLEN STINCHFIELD TESTAMENTARY TRUST 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION 13 CHARLES LEWIS, 14 Case No. CIV S-03-2646 WBS KJM Plaintiff, 15 v. 16 STIPULATION FOR ORDER OF DISMISSAL ROBERT RUSSELL, et al., [F.R.C.P. Rule 41(a)] 17 Defendants. Trial Date: September 16, 2014 18 AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS. 19 20 Defendants/Complainants/Third Party Plaintiffs, THE DAVIS CENTER, LLC; EMILY 21 STOVER, Individually and as Trustee of the STOVER FAMILY TRUST and as Personal 22 Representative for Melvin Stover (Deceased); and RICHARD ALBERT STINCHFIELD, 23 Individually and as Trustee of the ROBERT S. STINCHFIELD SEPARATE REAL PROPERTY 24 TRUST and as Trustee of the BARBARA ELLEN STINCHFIELD TESTAMENTARY TRUST 25 (collectively, “THE DAVIS CENTER”) and Defendant/Third Party Defendant MARTIN 26 FRANCHISES, INC., through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate to the following: 27 That THE DAVIS CENTER’s claims in its First Amended Third-Party Complaint filed on 28 or about September 6, 2007 in the above entitled action (“Claims”) be dismissed as against 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL 1 MARTIN FRANCHISES, INC. only, with prejudice, according to the terms of a Mutual Release 2 of Claims (the “Release”) entered into by and between THE DAVIS CENTER and MARTIN 3 FRANCHISES, INC. and having an effective date of June 21, 2012. 4 DATED: July 3, 2012 KOELLER, NEBEKER, CARLSON & HALUCK, LLP 5 /s/ Chad N. Dunigan 6 Chad N. Dunigan, Esq. Sara J. Dresser, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants/Cross-Complainants/ Third Party Plaintiffs, THE DAVIS CENTER, LLC; EMILY STOVER, Individually and as Trustee of the STOVER FAMILY TRUST and as Personal Representative for Melvin Stover (Deceased); and RICHARD ALBERT STINCHFIELD, Individually and as Trustee of the ROBERT S. STINCHFIELD SEPARATE REAL PROPERTY TRUST and as Trustee of the BARBARA ELLEN STINCHFIELD TESTAMENTARY TRUST 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 DATED: July 5, 2012 GORDON & REESE, LLP 15 /s/ Matthew P. Nugent ________________________________________________ Matthew P. Nugent, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant/Third Party Defendant, MARTIN FRANCHISES, INC. 16 17 18 19 20 21 ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Court, having reviewed and considered the stipulation set forth above and good cause appearing, issues the following Order: 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that THE DAVIS CENTER’s Claims in the above-entitled 23 action be, and hereby are, dismissed as against MARTIN FRANCHISES, INC. only, with 24 prejudice. 25 IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that the dismissal is expressly conditioned 26 upon the terms and conditions of the Release entered into by and between THE DAVIS CENTER 27 and MARTIN FRANCHISES, INC. on June 21, 2012. 28 IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that the Court retains jurisdiction of this matter 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL 1 2 3 for the sole purpose of taking any action needed to enforce the terms of the Release. IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that each of the parties hereto shall bear its own costs, including attorney’s fees, as provided in the Release. 4 5 Date: July 10, 2012 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?