Lewis, et al v. Russell, et al

Filing 543

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/21/2018 CONTINUING Final Pretrial Conference to 1/28/2019 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb; Jury Trial to 4/23/2019 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

JENNIFER HARTMAN KING (Bar No. 211313)
ALANNA C. LUNGREN (Bar No. 269668)
TYLER BOWLIN (Bar No. 305715)
HARTMAN KING PC
520 Capitol Mall, Suite 750
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
BEST, BEST & KRIEGER LLP
HARRIET A. STEINER (Bar No. 109436)
500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1700
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]

Exempt From Filing Fees Pursuant To
Government Code Section 6103

Attorneys for Counter Claimant
CITY OF DAVIS

HARTMAN KING PC
520 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 750
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
TEL: [phone] / FAX: [phone]

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16
17

CHARLES H. LEWIS AND JANE W.
LEWIS,
Plaintiffs,

18
19
20

v.

Case No.: CIV S-03-2646 WBS AC
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TRIAL AND
OTHER DEADLINES SET FORTH IN
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
[PROPOSED] ORDER

ROBERT D. RUSSELL, ET AL.,
Defendants,

21

[LR 144]
Trial Date: January 23, 2019

22
23

AND RELATED COUNTER, CROSS AND
THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS.

24
25
26
27
28
00033807.1

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TRIAL AND OTHER DEADLINES SET FORTH IN PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER;
[PROPOSED] ORDER

STIPULATION

1
2

Counter Claimant City of Davis (the “City”); Counter Claimants The Davis Center, LLC,

3

Emily A. Stover, individually and as Trustee of the Stover Family Trust and as Personal

4

Representative for Melvin Stover (Deceased), and Richard Albert Stinchfield, individually and as

5

Trustee of the Robert S. Stinchfield Separate Real Property Trust and as Trustee of the Barbara

6

Ellen Stinchfield Testamentary Trust (collectively, “Landowners”); Counter Claimants Potter

7

Taylor & Co., Potter, Long, Adams & Taylor Ltd., Davis Center, Potter-Taylor, Inc., Potter Taylor

8

& Scurfield, Inc. (collectively, “Potter-Taylor”); and Counter Defendants Charles H. Lewis

9

(Deceased) and Jane W. Lewis (Deceased), Estate of Charles H. Lewis (Deceased) and Robert

10

Zehnder as Personal Representative of Charles H. Lewis (Deceased) (“Lewis”) (the City,

11

Landowners, Potter-Taylor and Lewis are referred to collectively herein as the “Participating

12

Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

13

WHEREAS, on August 12, 2013, The Davis Center moved to amend the scheduling order

14

(Doc. No. 447) and the Participating Parties stipulated to extend the deadlines to disclose experts

15

(Doc. No. 458). On August 30, 2013, the Court entered Orders granting the Motion (Doc. No. 457)

16

and approving the Stipulation (Doc. No. 460).

17

WHEREAS, on February 28, 2014, the Participating Parties entered into a further stipulation

18

to amend the scheduling order to allow time to produce and compile data associated with the

19

investigative study (Doc. No. 472). On March 3, 2014, the Court entered an Order approving the

20

Stipulation (Doc. No. 474).

21

WHEREAS, on August 15, 2014, the Participating Parties entered into a further stipulation to

22

amend the scheduling order to allow time to produce and compile additional data associated with the

23

site investigation (Doc. No. 475). On August 19, 2014, the Court entered an Order approving the

24

Stipulation (Doc. No. 477).

25

WHEREAS, on December 12, 2014, the Participating Parties entered into a further stipulation

26

to amend the scheduling order to allow time to develop a cost estimate and work plan for the proposed

27

remediation (Doc. No. 478). On the same day, the Court entered an Order approving the Stipulation

28

(Doc. No. 479).
00033807.1

-2-

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TRIAL AND OTHER DEADLINES SET FORTH IN PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER;
[PROPOSED] ORDER

1

WHEREAS, on June 2, 2015, the Participating Parties entered into a further stipulation to

2

amend the scheduling order to allow additional time to develop a cost estimate and work plan for the

3

proposed remediation and to enter into possible mediation in an effort to resolve the case (Doc. No.

4

480). On June 15, 2015, the Court entered an Order approving the Stipulation (Doc. No. 481).

5

WHEREAS, the Participating Parties held a mediation in December of 2015, and since

6

that time have continued to negotiate settlement terms among themselves and with the California

7

Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region (“Regional Board”).

8

WHEREAS, on December 21, 2016, in light of progress in settlement negotiations, the

9

Participating Parties entered into a further stipulation to amend the scheduling order to allow

10

additional time to draft settlement documents and secure approval of those terms by all

11

Participating Parties (Doc. No. 511). On December 22, 2016, the Court entered an Order

12

approving the Stipulation (Doc. No. 512). Under that Order, the trial in this matter was set to

13

commence on October 31, 2017.

14

WHEREAS, on March 7, 2017, counsel for Lewis filed a Statement of Fact of Death in

15

the above-captioned action (“Action”), suggesting upon the record the death of Charles H. Lewis

16

and Jane W. Lewis (Doc. No. 518).

17

WHEREAS, on May 22, 2017, the Superior Court of California for Yolo County duly

18

appointed Robert Zehnder as Personal Representative of Charles H. Lewis in Case Number

19

PB17-94.

20
21

WHEREAS, on June 15, 2017, the Participating Parties transmitted various settlement
documents to the Regional Board, for its review and approval.

22

WHEREAS, on June 22, 2017, the Participating Parties entered into a stipulation agreeing

23

to substitute: 1) Robert Zehnder, as Personal Representative of Charles H. Lewis as a party to this

24

Action in place of Charles H. Lewis (Deceased) and Jane W. Lewis (Deceased) for purposes of

25

the City’s counter claims against Lewis only; and 2) the Estate of Charles H. Lewis (Deceased) as

26

a party to this Action in place of Charles H. Lewis (Deceased) and Jane W. Lewis (Deceased) for

27

purposes of the Landowner’s and Potter-Taylor’s respective counter claims against Lewis only

28

(Doc. No. 526).
00033807.1

-3-

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TRIAL AND OTHER DEADLINES SET FORTH IN PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER;
[PROPOSED] ORDER

1

WHEREAS, on June 22, 2017, in light of the Participating Parties’ progress in having

2

prepared the various settlement documents and efforts in the process to secure approval of the

3

settlement documents from the Regional Board, the Participating Parties entered into a further

4

stipulation to amend the scheduling order and extend the deadlines by three months (Doc. No.

5

527). On June 23, 2017, the Court entered an Order approving that stipulation (Doc. No. 529).

6

Under that Order, the trial in this matter was set to commence on January 30, 2018.

7

WHEREAS, on September 22, 2017, in light of progress in settlement negotiations, the

8

Participating Parties entered into a further stipulation to amend the scheduling order to allow

9

additional time to revise settlement documents and secure approval of those terms by all

10

Participating Parties (Doc. No. 531). On the same date, the Court entered an Order approving the

11

Stipulation (Doc. No. 532). Under that Order, the trial in this matter was set to commence on

12

May 1, 2018.

13

WHEREAS, on December 13, 2017, counsel for the City filed a Motion for Summary

14

Judgment or, In the Alternative, Summary Adjudication as to Cross-Claimants Jung Hang Suh

15

and Soo Jung Suh (Doc. No. 533) which was heard on February 5, 2018 (Doc. No. 538).

16
17

WHEREAS, on December 14, 2017, the Court issued its own Minute Order continuing
the Pretrial Conference from February 26, 2018 to March 12, 2018 (Doc. No. 534).

18

WHEREAS, at that time the Participating Parties had not yet reached agreement on the

19

final terms of the Agreement and Covenant Not to Sue (“CNS”) between the Regional Board, and

20

the Participating Parties, but continued their negotiations.

21

WHEREAS, on January 5, 2018, the Regional Board submitted material revisions and

22

changes to the CNS. On January 18, 2018, counsel for Landowners advised all parties to the

23

CNS that their clients rejected the Regional Board’s material revisions to the CNS and offered

24

alternative language.

25

WHEREAS, on January 25, 2018, in light of continued coordination between the

26

Participating Parties to negotiate the terms of the various settlement documents and the Regional

27

Board’s need for additional time to complete its review of the revised settlement documents, the

28

Participating Parties entered into a further stipulation to amend the scheduling order (Doc. No.
00033807.1
-4STIPULATION TO EXTEND TRIAL AND OTHER DEADLINES SET FORTH IN PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER;
[PROPOSED] ORDER

1

536).

2

WHEREAS, on January 26, 2018, the Court entered an Order approving the Stipulation

3

(Doc. No. 537). Under that Order, the trial in this matter was set to commence on August 7,

4

2018, and the pre-trial conference was reset to June 18, 2018.

5

WHEREAS, on February 6, 2018, the Court entered an Order granting the City’s Motion

6

for Summary Judgment or, In the Alternative, Summary Adjudication as to Cross-Claimants Jung

7

Hang Suh and Soo Jung Suh (Doc. No. 539).

8

WHEREAS, on May 11, 2018, in light of continued coordination between the

9

Participating Parties to finalize the various settlement documents, and to avoid unnecessarily

10

directing the Participating Parties’ resources to trial preparation, the Participating Parties entered

11

into a further stipulation to amend the scheduling order (Doc. No. 540).

12

WHEREAS, on May 14, 2018, the Court entered an Order approving the Stipulation (Doc.

13

No. 541). Under that Order, the trial in this matter was set to commence on January 23, 2019, and

14

the pre-trial conference was reset to October 22, 2018.

15

WHEREAS, since the Court’s May 14, 2018, Order resetting the trial date to January 23,

16

2019, the Participating Parties have continued to work toward finalizing the revised settlement

17

documents, and this effort is on-going to date. Over the last few months, various revisions to the

18

settlement documents necessitated further coordination between the Participating Parties and the

19

Regional Board. At this stage, the Participating Parties are in the process of obtaining final client

20

approval. For example, now that the settlement documents are in near-final form and the City of

21

Davis City Council has returned from summer recess, Counsel for the City plans to meet with the

22

City Manager and appear before the City Council in October 2018 regarding finalization of the

23

settlement documents.

24

WHEREAS, due to the upcoming January 23, 2019, trial date, proceeding toward trial on the

25

current schedule would unnecessarily direct the Participating Parties’ resources to trial preparation.

26

An extension of the existing deadlines by approximately three months will allow the Participating

27

Parties to focus their resources on finalizing the various settlement documents and allow sufficient

28

time to obtain final client approvals of the settlement documents and avoid the need for trial.
00033807.1
-5STIPULATION TO EXTEND TRIAL AND OTHER DEADLINES SET FORTH IN PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER;
[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2
3

NOW THEREFORE, the Participating Parties hereby stipulate to extend the existing
deadlines to the following dates:
1. Final pre-trial conference is reset to January 21, 2019, or at such time that is convenient
for the Court; and

4
5

2. Jury trial is reset for April 24, 2019, or at such time that is convenient for the Court.

6
7

Dated: September 21, 2018

Respectfully submitted,

8
Law Offices of Francis M. Goldsberry
9
10
By: /s/ Francis M. Goldsberry (as authorized on Sept. 18, 2018)
Francis M. Goldsberry

11

Attorneys for Counter Claimants Potter-Taylor & Co.; Potter, Long,
Adams & Taylor, Ltd.; Davis Center; Potter-Taylor, Inc. and Potter
Taylor & Scurfield, Inc.

12
13
14

Dated: September 21, 2018

15

Respectfully submitted,
Hartman King, PC

16
17
By: /s/ Jennifer Hartman King
Jennifer Hartman King

18
19

Attorneys for Counter Claimant City of Davis

20
21

Dated: September 21, 2018

Respectfully submitted,
Koeller, Nebeker, Carlson & Haluck, LLP

22
23

By: /s/ Peter Dye (as authorized on Sept. 18, 2018)
Peter Dye

24

Attorneys for Counter Claimants The Davis Center, LLC; Emily A.
Stover, individually and as Trustee of the Stover Family Trust and
as Personal Representative for Melvin Stover (Deceased); and
Richard Albert Stinchfield, individually and as Trustee of the
Robert S. Stinchfield Separate Real Property Trust and as Trustee of
the Barbara Ellen Stinchfield Testamentary Trust

25
26
27
28
00033807.1

-6-

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TRIAL AND OTHER DEADLINES SET FORTH IN PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER;
[PROPOSED] ORDER

1

Dated: September 21, 2018

2

Respectfully submitted,
Schuering Zimmerman & Doyle LLP

3
By: /s/ Keith D. Chidlaw (as authorized on Sept. 18, 2018)
Keith D. Chidlaw

4
5

Attorneys for Counter Defendants Charles H. Lewis (Deceased) and
Jane W. Lewis (Deceased), Robert Zehnder, as Personal
Representative of Charles H. Lewis, and Estate of Charles H. Lewis
(Deceased)

6
7
8

ORDER

9
10
11
12
13

For good cause and pursuant to the above stipulation of the Participating Parties, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Final pre-trial conference is reset to January 28, 2019 at 1:30 p.m.;
2. Jury trial is reset for April 23, 2019 at 9:00 a.m.

14
15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 21, 2018

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
00033807.1

-7-

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TRIAL AND OTHER DEADLINES SET FORTH IN PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER;
[PROPOSED] ORDER