Cox v. Ylst

Filing 157

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/28/15 ORDERING that Petitioners March 13, 2015 Motion to Perpetuate the Testimony of Dr. Albert Globus (ECF No. 143 ) is GRANTED. Petitioners April 15, 2015 Motion to Introduce Declaratio ns in Lieu of Testimony and/or to Perpetuate Testimony (ECF No. 146 ) is GRANTED with respect to witnesses Marjorie Comer, Joanne Wells, Shirley Garrett, Timothy Jayne, Fairman Jayne, and David Kurtzman. The motion is DENIED with respect to witness Marijo Giardina. Within thirty days of the filed date of this order, the parties shall meet and confer regarding the method for taking the testimony of these witnesses. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL A. COX, 12 13 14 15 Petitioner, No. 2:04-CV-0065 MCE CKD DEATH PENALTY CASE v. WARDEN, San Quentin State Prison, ORDER Respondent. 16 17 On May 27, 2015, the undersigned heard argument on petitioner’s motions to perpetuate 18 the testimony of five social history witnesses, two jurors, and trial expert Dr. Albert Globus. 19 (ECF Nos. 143, 146.) Lissa Gardner and Lindsay Bennett appeared for petitioner. Todd Marshall 20 appeared for respondent. After considering the parties’ briefs and the arguments of counsel, the 21 court finds and orders as follows. 22 A court may permit the preservation of testimony by deposition upon a showing that the 23 testimony is material to a party’s claims and there is a risk that the testimony may be permanently 24 lost if the party is required to wait through the normal course of litigation. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 25 27(a); Penn Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. United States, 68 F.3d 1371, 1375 (D.C. Cir. 1995) 26 (permitting deposition of elderly witnesses to preserve testimony). Petitioner demonstrates that 27 the witnesses’ expected testimony is material to his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel 28 and/or juror misconduct and is not cumulative of other possible testimony. Cf. In re Bay County 1 1 Middlegrounds Landfill Site, 171 F.3d 1044, 1046-47 (6th Cir. 1999) (“Evidence that throws a 2 different, greater, or additional light on a key issue might well ‘prevent a failure or delay of 3 justice.’”). With respect to all witnesses except Ms. Giardina, petitioner also demonstrates that 4 their testimony may become unavailable if it is not obtained soon. See Penn Mutual, 68 F.3d at 5 1375. 6 Respondent has not established that permitting the perpetuation of testimony at this stage 7 of the proceedings is inappropriate. Cf. Cullen v. Pinholster, 118 S. Ct. 1388, 1411 n. 20 (“[W]e 8 need not decide . . . whether a district court may ever choose to hold an evidentiary hearing before 9 it determines that § 2254(d) has been satisfied.”) Nor has respondent established that resolution 10 of the merits of petitioner’s claims or their procedural issues is a necessary precursor to 11 permitting the perpetuation of testimony. Finally, it should be noted that by permitting the 12 perpetuation of testimony at this point, this court is making no decision about the admissibility of 13 each witnesses’ testimony in any evidentiary proceeding. 14 Accordingly, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 15 1. Petitioner’s March 13, 2015 Motion to Perpetuate the Testimony of Dr. Albert Globus 16 (ECF No. 143) is granted. 17 2. Petitioner’s April 15, 2015 Motion to Introduce Declarations in Lieu of Testimony 18 and/or to Perpetuate Testimony (ECF No. 146) is granted with respect to witnesses 19 Marjorie Comer, Joanne Wells, Shirley Garrett, Timothy Jayne, Fairman Jayne, and 20 David Kurtzman. The motion is denied with respect to witness Marijo Giardina. 21 Within thirty days of the filed date of this order, the parties shall meet and confer 22 regarding the method for taking the testimony of these witnesses. 23 Dated: May 28, 2015 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 cox mtn to perp.or 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?