Cox v. Ylst

Filing 91

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 04/15/11 ordering respondent's responsive pleading is due on 05/09/11 88 . That responsive pleading shall include points and authorities on the impact of Cullen v. Pinholster on these proceedin gs. Petitioenr's 04/11/11 motion for an extension of time to file the traverse 89 is granted. Petitioner's traverse shall be filed by 06/13/11. The traverse shall include responsive points and authorities addressing Pinholster.(Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

MICHAEL ANTHONY COX,

11
12
13

Petitioner,

No. CIV S-04-0065 MCE DAD

vs.

DEATH PENALTY CASE

WARDEN, San Quentin
State Prison,

14
Respondent.

ORDER

15
/
16
Respondent’s responsive pleading is due on May 9, 2011. (Dkt. No. 88.) That
17
responsive pleading shall include points and authorities on the impact of Cullen v. Pinholster,
18
No. 09-1088, 2011 WL 1225705 (U.S. Apr. 4, 2011) on these proceedings.
19
Petitioner’s April 11, 2011 Motion for an Extension of Time to File the Traverse
20
is granted. (Dkt. No. 89.) Petitioner’s traverse shall be filed by June 13, 2011. The traverse
21
shall include responsive points and authorities addressing Pinholster.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
DATED: April 15, 2011.
24
25
26

cox pin.or

1