Ellington v. Alamieda, et al

Filing 216

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/16/2009 ORDERING that the 9/11/2009 findings and recommendations are adopted in full; 208 Motion for a preliminary injunction is denied and 205 Motion for a judgment on the pleadings is denied. (Matson, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. E.S. ALAMEIDA, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On September 11, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARCUS RUBEN ELLINGTON, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0666 JAM KJM P 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 /elli0666.805 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 11, 2009, are adopted in full; 2. Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction (Docket No. 208) is denied; and 3. Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Docket No. 205) is denied. DATED: October 16, 2009. /s/ John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?