Ellington v. Alamieda, et al

Filing 253

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Robert S. Lasnik on 12/1/2010 ORDERING that because no hearings were held that could have been transcribed, plaintiff's 251 motion is DENIED.(Duong, D)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 MARCUS R. ELLINGTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) E.S. ALAMEIDA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) CASE NO. C04-cv-0666RSL-JLW UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR TRANSCRIPTS

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff's "Motion for transcripts at Government Expense and, request for Transcript designation form." Dkt. # 251. Plaintiff seeks transcripts of "the dismissal of defendants at the start of the suit" and "the hearings wherein[] the court dismissed Defendant-Rohlfing . . . ." Motion at 1. The Court has reviewed the docket in the above-captioned matter and cannot find any record of a hearing. The claims against defendants were dismissed after consideration of Reports and Recommendations, the objections, thereto, and any responses: no oral argument or testimony was heard. Because no hearings were held that could have been transcribed, plaintiff's motion is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of the docket in the abovecaptioned matter. DATED this 1st day of December, 2010.

A Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR TRANSCRIPTS - 1