Davis v. Knowles, et al

Filing 153

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/16/2010 ORDERING 151 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are adopted in full; and the motions to alter or amend judgment 141 142 are denied. (Matson, R)

Download PDF
(PC) Davis v. Knowles, et al Doc. 153 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. M. KNOWLES, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 16, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KENNARD LEE DAVIS, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0821 LKK KJM P ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 denied. and Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 16, 2010, are adopted in full; 2. The motions to alter or amend judgment (Docket Nos. 141 and 142) are DATED: September 16, 2010. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?