Ayala v. CDC, et al
Filing
95
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 2/1/08 ORDERING that the Clerk is directed to reserve the 12/19/07 81 Findings and Recommendations on Plaintiff at his current address of record. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
(PC) Ayala v. CDC, et al
Doc. 95
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. ANDREASEN, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 19, 2007, the court issued findings and recommendations that unserved defendants Sullwold, Sawker, and Gutierrez be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). On January 8, 2008, the court sua sponte extended the deadline for plaintiff to file objections to those findings and recommendations given plaintiff's recent transfer to another prison. Objections are now due within 45 days of January 8, 2008. Pending before the court is plaintiff's document (Doc. 94) filed on January 30, 2008, in which he states that he objects to the findings and recommendations because he never received a copy due to the change in address resulting from his prison transfer. The court will direct the Clerk of the Court to re-serve a copy of the December 19, 2007, findings and 1
Dockets.Justia.com
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MANUEL AYALA, Plaintiff,
No. CIV S-04-0903-RRB-CMK-P
ORDER
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
recommendations at his current address of record. Objections are due within the time permitted by the January 8th order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ordered that the Clerk of the Court is directed to reserve the December 19, 2007, findings and recommendations on plaintiff at his current address of record.
DATED: February 1, 2008 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?