Lewis v. CA Dept Corrections, et al
Filing
26
ORDER ADOPTING 25 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/12/2013. Petitioner's 22 Motion for Stay and for conditional 22 Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss the Petition is DENIED. Michael Anthony Lewis's 23 Motion to Amend the Petition is DENIED. The Traverse, if any, shall be filed on or before 5/10/2013. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
MICHAEL ANTHONY LEWIS,
11
Petitioner,
12
13
No. 2:04-cv-1136 JAM EFB P
vs.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
14
Respondents.
15
ORDER
/
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, has filed an application for
17
a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States
18
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On March 11, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
20
herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any
21
objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither
22
party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
23
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
25
ORDERED that:
26
/////
1
1
1. The findings and recommendations filed March 11, 2013, are adopted in full;
2
2. Petitioner’s motion for a stay, Dckt. No. 22, is denied;
3
3. Petitioner’s conditional motion to voluntarily dismiss the petition, Dckt. No.
4
22, is denied;
5
4. Petitioner’s motion to amend the petition, Dckt. No. 23, is denied; and
6
5. Petitioner’s traverse, if any, shall be filed on or before May 10, 2013.
7
8
DATED:
April 12, 2013
/s/ John A. Mendez
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?