Lewis v. CA Dept Corrections, et al

Filing 26

ORDER ADOPTING 25 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/12/2013. Petitioner's 22 Motion for Stay and for conditional 22 Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss the Petition is DENIED. Michael Anthony Lewis's 23 Motion to Amend the Petition is DENIED. The Traverse, if any, shall be filed on or before 5/10/2013. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL ANTHONY LEWIS, 11 Petitioner, 12 13 No. 2:04-cv-1136 JAM EFB P vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., 14 Respondents. 15 ORDER / 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, has filed an application for 17 a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 18 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On March 11, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 11, 2013, are adopted in full; 2 2. Petitioner’s motion for a stay, Dckt. No. 22, is denied; 3 3. Petitioner’s conditional motion to voluntarily dismiss the petition, Dckt. No. 4 22, is denied; 5 4. Petitioner’s motion to amend the petition, Dckt. No. 23, is denied; and 6 5. Petitioner’s traverse, if any, shall be filed on or before May 10, 2013. 7 8 DATED: April 12, 2013 /s/ John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?