Rameses v. Lacey, et al
Filing
98
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 10/28/11 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 10/4/11 95 are ADOPTED in full; Petitioner's third MOTION for Relief from Judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b), filed on 9/2/11 94 is DISMISSED; And Any further filings from Petitioner in this closed case are to disregarded. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ROBERT RAMESES,
11
12
13
14
Petitioner,
vs.
SCOTT KERNAN, et al.,
Respondents.
15
16
No. CIV S-04-1173 GEB GGH P
ORDER
/
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ
17
of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States
18
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On October 4, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
20
herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any
21
objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner
22
has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
23
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule
24
304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire
25
file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
26
proper analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed October 4, 2011, are adopted in full;
3
2. Petitioner’s third motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b), filed
4
5
6
on September 2, 2011 (Docket No. 94), is dismissed; and
3. Any further filings from petitioner in this closed case are to be disregarded.
Dated: October 28, 2011
7
8
9
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?