Chappell v. Pliler, et al

Filing 119

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/28/2017 GRANTING 112 Motion for Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses at Trial. At the appropriate time, the court will issue separate writs of habeas corpus ad testificandum. (York, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 REX CHAPPELL, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:04-cv-1183 TLN DB P v. ORDER C.K. PLILER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with counsel in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. 17 18 § 1983. Plaintiff moves for the attendance at trial of incarcerated witnesses. (ECF No. 112.) 19 Defendants have not filed an opposition to plaintiff’s motion. The Court has discretion to grant a motion for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses if the 20 21 moving party has shown the witnesses have relevant information and the Court determines the 22 witnesses' presence will substantially further the resolution of the case. Wiggins v. County of 23 Alameda, 717 F.2d 466, 468 n.1 (9th Cir. 1983). Plaintiff has demonstrated that three 24 incarcerated witnesses, John Roseberry, Samuel Solomon, and Benjamin Washington, have 25 personal knowledge of information that is relevant to the claims in this action. 26 Accordingly, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion 27 for the Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses (ECF No. 112) is granted. At the appropriate time, 28 //// 1 1 the court will issue separate writs of habeas corpus ad testificandum to secure the attendance of 2 Mr. Roseberry, Mr. Solomon, and Mr. Washington at trial. 3 Dated: November 28, 2017 4 5 6 7 8 DLB:9 DLB1/prisoner-civil rights/chap1183.mot for ws 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?