Woods v. Carey, et al

Filing 256

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 04/14/11 ordering on 03/31/11, plaintiff filed a motion to compel dental treatment through the issuance of a writ of mandamus 255 . This civil rights action was closed on 02/13/09. Plaintiff's filing does not appear to be one contemplated by the Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure. Therefore, this document will be placed in the file and disregarded.(Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERNEST CASSELL WOODS II, 11 12 13 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1225 LKK GGH P vs. TOM L. CAREY, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 On March 31, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion to compel dental treatment through 17 the issuance of a writ of mandamus. This civil rights action was closed on February 13, 2009. 18 Plaintiff’s filing does not appear to be one contemplated by the Federal Rules of Civil or 19 Appellate Procedure.1 Therefore, this document will be placed in the file and disregarded. 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: April 14, 2011 22 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 23 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 1 “[T]he All Writs Act does not operate to confer jurisdiction and may only be invoked in aid of jurisdiction which already exists.” Malone v. Calderon, 165 F.3d 1234, 1237 (9th Cir. 1999). 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?