Woods v. Carey, et al
Filing
320
ORDER denying 319 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/08/14. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
EARNEST CASSELL WOODS, II,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:04-cv01225 MCE AC P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
TOM L. CAREY, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
18
On September 2, 2014, plaintiff filed a motion requesting that the court appoint counsel. District
19
courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases.
20
Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the
21
court may request an attorney to voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. See 28 U.S.C. §
22
1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900
23
F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). When determining whether “exceptional circumstances”
24
exist, the court must consider plaintiff’s likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability
25
of the plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues
26
involved. Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009) (district court did not abuse
27
discretion in declining to appoint counsel). The burden of demonstrating exceptional
28
circumstances is on the plaintiff. Id. Circumstances common to most prisoners, such as lack of
1
1
legal education and limited law library access, do not establish exceptional circumstances that
2
warrant a request for voluntary assistance of counsel.
3
Having considered the factors under Palmer, the court finds that plaintiff has failed to
4
meet his burden of demonstrating exceptional circumstances warranting the appointment of
5
counsel at this time.
6
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s September 2, 2014 motion for
7
the appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice.
8
DATED: September 8, 2014
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?