Woods v. Carey, et al

Filing 338

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/29/2015 SETTING a Settlement Conference for 1/7/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire; each party shall provide a confidential settlement statement to chamb ers, no later than 12/31/2015; the court will issue a writ of habeas corpus ad testicandum for plaintiff's appearance at the settlement conference at a later date; within 14 days, counsel for defendant must file a notice re estimated trial length and dates in accordance with this order. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EARNEST CASSELL WOODS, II, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:04-cv-01225 MCE AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER TOM L. CAREY, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. The court has determined that this case will benefit from a settlement conference 19 and the parties have agreed to the undersigned serving as the settlement judge and have waived 20 any conflict that may arise as a result. ECF Nos. 336, 337. Therefore, this case will be referred 21 to the undersigned to conduct a settlement conference on January 7, 2016, at 9:00 a.m., at the 22 Robert T. Matsui Federal Courthouse, 801 I Street, Courtroom 26, Sacramento, CA 95814. A 23 separate order and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum will issue at a later date to provide for 24 plaintiff’s attendance at the settlement conference. 25 To avoid delay in the event the settlement conference is unsuccessful, the court will 26 proceed with setting a trial date. Counsel for defendant will be required to file a notice with the 27 court advising of the estimated length of trial and any dates he or the defendant will be 28 unavailable for trial in May and June 2016. Plaintiff may also file a notice regarding his 1 1 availability during that time. 2 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. This case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire 4 on January 7, 2016, at 9:00 a.m., at the Robert T. Matsui Federal Courthouse, 801 I Street, 5 Courtroom 26, Sacramento, CA 95814. 6 7 8 9 10 11 2. Each party must have a principle with full and unlimited authority to negotiate and enter into a binding settlement attend in person. 3. Those in attendance must be prepared to discuss the claims, defenses and damages. The failure of any counsel, party, or authorized person subject to this order to appear in person may result in the imposition of sanctions. 4. Each party shall provide a confidential settlement statement to chambers, no later 12 than December 31, 2015, via e-mail to acorders@caed.uscourts.gov. If plaintiff is unable to 13 access the internet, he shall, on or before December 24, 2015, send his statement to the court by 14 mail at 501 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814, and indicate on the envelope and on the face of the 15 statement that it is a confidential communication to Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. Such 16 statements are neither to be filed with the Clerk nor served on the opposing party. However, each 17 party shall notify the other party that the statement has been submitted to the judge’s chambers. 18 19 20 5. The court will issue a writ of habeas corpus ad testificuandum for plaintiff’s appearance at the settlement conference at a later date. 6. Within fourteen days of the filing of this order, counsel for defendant must file a 21 notice advising the court of the estimated length of trial and of any dates he is unavailable for trial 22 in May and June 2016. If plaintiff wishes, within fourteen days of the date this order is filed, he 23 may also file a notice advising of any dates he is unavailable for trial in May and June 2016. 24 DATED: April 29, 2015 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?