Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports US, et al

Filing 150

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/4/11: On March 18, 2011, this court ordered counsel for plaintiff to show cause why sanctions should not issue for counsel's failure to attach a proposed amended complaint to plaintiff's motion to file an amended complaint. Counsel has filed a response. Good cause having been shown, the court finds that no sanction is appropriate.(Matson, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 PIER 1 IMPORTS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 / On March 18, 2011, this court ordered counsel for plaintiff to show cause why sanctions should not issue for counsel's failure to attach a proposed amended complaint to plaintiff's motion to file an amended complaint. Counsel has filed a response. Good cause having been shown, the court finds that no sanction is appropriate. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: April 4, 2011. O R D E R BYRON CHAPMAN, NO. CIV. S-04-1339 LKK CMK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?