Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports US, et al
Filing
231
JUDGMENT OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/30/15. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BYRON CHAPMAN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:04-cv-01339 MCE AC
v.
PIER 1 IMPORTS (U.S.), INC,,
15
JUDGMENT OF PERMANENT
INJUNCTION
Defendant.
16
On July 23, 2012, the Court issued a Judgment of Permanent Injunction (ECF No.
17
18
213). On March 5, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued
19
an opinion that, inter alia, remanded the case to this Court for modification of the
20
Permanent Injunction. See Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.) Inc., 779 F.3d 1001 (9th
21
Cir. 2015). Consistent with the Ninth Circuit’s directive, the July 23, 2012 Permanent
22
Injunction is hereby VACATED, and this Judgment of Permanent Injunction is issued in
23
its stead.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Pier 1, its officers,
2
agents, representative, employees, and all persons in active concert and participation
3
with them are PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from blocking the aisles of its Vacaville store
4
with merchandise or other obstacles, such that the clear path through the aisles is
5
narrower than thirty-six (36) inches wide (or permitting such blockages), except for the
6
unavoidable transitory blockages caused by re-stocking or similar activities.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 30, 2015
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?