Tholmer v. Pliler, et al

Filing 122

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/8/09 ORDERING that the MOTION for Reconsideration 119 is DENIED. The Magistrate Judge's 6/24/09 Order is affirmed and no further motions for reconsideration of this order will be considered. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 LIONELL THOLMER, 12 13 vs. Plaintiff, ORDER 2:04-cv-1368-GEB-CMK-P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14 CHERYL K. PLILER, et al., 15 16 17 Defendants / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant

18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 Eastern District of California local rules. Pending before the court is a motion for reconsideration 20 (Doc. 119) of the Magistrate Judge's June 24, 2009 order. 21 Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate

22 judge's order shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the 23 entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly 24 erroneous or contrary to law. The June 24, 2009, order is, therefore, affirmed. 25 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The motion for reconsideration (Doc. 119) is denied; 1

1 2

2. 3.

The Magistrate Judge's June 24, 2009 order is affirmed; and No further motions for reconsideration of this order will be considered.

3 Dated: September 8, 2009 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge