Wade v. County of Sacramento, et al

Filing 73

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/8/09 ORDERING re 72 that upon reconsideration, the 70 order of the magistrate judge filed November 24, 2008, is AFFIRMED. (Duong, D)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. / On December 12, 2008, plaintiff filed a document styled, "Objections To The Magistrate's Findings/Order" (Docket No. 72), which the court construes as a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed November 24, 2008, denying plaintiff's motion to amend the scheduling order. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. ///// ///// ///// 1 ORDER CHANCELLOR WADE, Plaintiff, 2:04-cv-1711-GEB-DAD-P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed November 24, 2008, is affirmed. Dated: January 8, 2009

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge

2