Wade v. County of Sacramento, et al

Filing 76

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/21/09 ORDERING that the pretrial conference set for 1/30/09 is VACATED; RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Objections due within 20 days.(Dillon, M)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. / By order filed November 24, 2008, this court directed plaintiff to file a pretrial statement on or before December 29, 2008. Plaintiff has not responded to the court's order. The court will therefore recommend that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); Local Rule 11-110. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the pretrial conference set for January 30, 2009 is vacated; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); Local Rule 11-110. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 1 ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHANCELLOR WADE, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1711 GEB DAD P

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any reply to the objections shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: January 21, 2009.

DAD:4 wade1711.fpts

2