Wordtech Systems Inc v. Integrated Network, et al
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 09/17/09 ORDERING that no exhibits are to be returned to this Court. (Benson, A.)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 16 17 18 Defendants. 19 ----oo0oo---20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court is in receipt of a communication from Defendants' appellate counsel asking that this Court accept the return of the parties' trial exhibits for retention during the pendency of Defendants' appeal. For the following reasons, the parties are INTEGRATED NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC., dba INTEGRATED NETWORK SOLUTIONS, CORP. aka INTEGRATED NETWORK SOLUTIONS aka INTEGRATED SYSTEMS aka INTEGRATED NETWORK STORAGE COMPANY aka INSC; et al., ORDER WORDTECH SYSTEMS, INC., a California corporation No. 2:04-cv-01971-MCE-EFB UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ordered to maintain possession of those exhibits. First, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 10(a), the record on appeal consists of, inter alia, "the original papers and exhibits filed in the district court." 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Consistent with Eastern District Local Rule 39-138(3), none of the exhibits returned to the parties were "filed" in the district court. Rule 39-138(3) states, "Exhibits offered or admitted at
trial will not be scanned or received electronically unless ordered by the Court." were not filed. No Court order being had, those exhibits
Accordingly, they are not part of the record
maintained by the Clerk of this Court. Additionally, the parties stipulated to and the Court ordered that the above exhibits be returned to the respective parties. Indeed, the parties stipulated on the record to the Reporter's Transcript of Jury Furthermore, Defendants'
return of the trial exhibits.
Trial, 17:25-18:15 (November 17, 2008).
trial counsel authorized the Court in writing (Docket No. 323) to release the defense exhibits to Defendants' appellate counsel, and appellate counsel accepted those exhibits, signing a receipt (Docket No. 324) acknowledging the same. Finally, consistent with the practices of the Federal Circuit, if that court determines the original record is required, it will issue its own order requiring transmission. At that time,
the parties, who maintain actual possession of their own trial exhibits, may submit those exhibits to the circuit court. Accordingly, no exhibits are to be returned to this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 17, 2009
_____________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?