Reed v. Williams et al

Filing 270

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/26/13 ORDERING that plaintiffs February 1, 2011 motion to appeal (Dkt. No. 250 ) and motion to stay (Dkt. No. 254 ) are DENIED as moot.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

RONALD REED,

11

Plaintiff,

12

No. 2: 05-cv-0060 JAM KJN P

vs.

13

DR. B. WILLIAMS, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15

/

16
17

ORDER

On December 20, 2010, judgment was entered following a jury trial. On March
21, 2013, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment.

18

Pending before the court are plaintiff’s February 1, 2011 motion for permission to

19

appeal and February 3, 2011 motion to stay pending a ruling on the motion to appeal. Because

20

judgment has been affirmed by the Ninth Circuit, plaintiff’s pending motions are moot.

21

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s February 1, 2011 motion

22

to appeal (Dkt. No. 250) and motion to stay (Dkt. No. 254) are denied as moot.

23

DATED: March 26, 2013

24

_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26

reed60.ord

1