Williams v. Sandham et al

Filing 148

ORDER ADOPTING 143 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/5/12. Dfts' 8/2/11 request for the entry of summary judgment is DENIED. (Manzer, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

CURTIS J. WILLIAMS,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13
14

vs.
R. W. SANDHAM, et al.,
Defendants.

15
16

No. CIV S-05-0164 JAM EFB P

ORDER
/

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

17

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

18

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

19

On November 16, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

20

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

21

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendant

22

Steen has filed objections to the findings and recommendations, which defendants Mangis,

23

Sandham and Rohlfing have joined.

24

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule

25

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

26

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
1

1

proper analysis.

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

3

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 16, 2011, are adopted in

4
5

full; and
2. Defendants’ August 2, 2011 request for the entry of summary judgment in their

6

favor at the pretrial conference is denied.

7

DATED: March 5, 2012

8
9

/s/ John A. Mendez
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2