Stinson v. Doyle

Filing 42

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 07/19/10 denying 41 Motion for the court to waive the remaining $90 of the filing fee still owed. The court notes that it will issue no response to future filings by plaintiff in this action not authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. (Plummer, M)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. DOYLE, et al., Defendants. / On May 21, 2004, this action was dismissed pursuant to plaintiff's request for voluntary dismissal. Notwithstanding the fact that this case is now closed, plaintiff filed on July 12, 2010, a request for the court to waive the remaining $90 of the filing fee that is still owed. However, plaintiff is not entitled to a refund or waiver of any funds collected by this court as a result of his own filings. Accordingly, plaintiff's request is denied. The court notes that it will issue no response to future filings by plaintiff in this action not authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. So ordered. Dated: July 19, 2010. ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARK LEE STINSON, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0361 FCD EFB P