Padula v. Morris

Filing 277

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/7/14 ORDERING no grounds having been presented that warrant reconsideration, Plaintiff's Motion 276 is DENIED. (Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DAYNA PADULA, et al.,

12

Plaintiffs,

13
14

No. 2:05-cv-00411-MCE-EFB

v.

ORDER

ROBERT MORRIS, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 276) of

17
18

its Order granting Defendants’ request for costs (ECF No. 276). This Court may

19

reconsider its prior decision for any of the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence,

20

surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence; (3) fraud,

21

misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party; (4) the judgment is void;

22

(5) judgment has been satisfied, released or discharged; and (6) any other reason that

23

justifies relief. Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Plaintiff’s Motion does nothing more than rehash

24

arguments already considered and rejected.

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

No grounds having been presented that warrant reconsideration, Plaintiff’s Motion (ECF

2

No. 276) is DENIED.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 7, 2014

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2